40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
B+W XS-Pro Clear MRC-Nano 007 Filter

B+W · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection

B+W XS-Pro Clear MRC-Nano 007 Filter

F · High PFAS

Camera filter coating composition unclear; no PFAS disclosure available.

Verdict: SkipOptical glass filter with inert coating; no established safety concerns beyond unclarity on coating composition. Minimal contact risk during normal use.

B+W filters use proprietary MRC-nano coatings for water and dust repellency. Brand does not disclose PFAS status; coating chemistry remains unconfirmed from public sources.

The safe swap

B+W 67mm UV Haze Filter

B+W

B+W 67mm UV Haze Filter

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Optical glass with MRC-nano multi-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The B+W XS-Pro Clear is built from optical-grade borosilicate glass, a chemically stable material with high resistance to leaching and thermal shock. The MRC-nano coating is a multi-resistant anti-reflective layer designed to reduce glare and improve light transmission; B+W does not publicly disclose the specific chemical composition of this proprietary coating. Since the filter sits between a camera lens and sensor with no direct contact with food, skin, or inhalable particles during normal use, the coating chemistry poses minimal practical exposure risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

B+W (Schneider Optics) is a German manufacturer with a long history in optical coatings and has not published transparency statements regarding PFAS, heavy metals, or VOC content in filter coatings. The brand maintains ISO 9001 quality certification and does not carry known public recalls or safety violations specific to this product line. However, the company's silence on coating composition leaves questions about whether fluorochemicals or other industrial additives are present in the MRC-nano layer.

How it compares in its category

Optical filters are a niche product category; most alternatives (Hoya, Marumi, Tiffen) similarly withhold detailed coating chemistry from public disclosure. Unlike cookware or food-contact plastics, camera filters face minimal regulatory pressure around chemical transparency. B+W's MRC-nano coatings are considered industry-standard in durability and optical performance, with no evidence of alternative products using demonstrably safer coating technologies.

If you buy it

Filters require no special handling during use; store dry and avoid prolonged contact with skin oils or moisture that could degrade the coating over years. Do not expose to solvents or abrasive cleaning; use only microfiber cloths and lens-grade cleaning solutions. Replacement is typically triggered by visible coating scratches or optical degradation, not age. If you work in a profession with repeated chemical exposure (laboratories, industrial settings), glove use during handling is sensible practice.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Coating degradation and inhalation risk

If the MRC-nano coating flakes or degrades over extended use, microscopic particles could become airborne during cleaning or handling. No public data exists on particle size or toxicity; risk is highly dependent on actual coating adhesion and composition, which is undisclosed.

Possible

Unidentified coating additives

Multi-layer anti-reflective coatings often contain metallic oxides, silicon-based compounds, or fluorine-based additives to achieve optical properties. B+W has not disclosed whether MRC-nano uses fluorochemicals, heavy metals, or other substances of concern; this ambiguity prevents full hazard assessment.

None known

Glass integrity under impact

Borosilicate optical glass is durable and shatter-resistant under normal photography use. No established safety concern with the glass substrate itself in this application.

None known

Skin contact allergies or irritation

Optical filters are handled briefly and do not contact skin during normal camera operation. No allergens or irritants have been reported for B+W filters in product reviews or safety databases.

None known

Leaching into moisture

Borosilicate glass is chemically inert to water and dilute solutions. The coating is not food-contact and sits in air during use, so leaching into consumables is not a practical concern.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 55% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection

B+W 67mm UV Haze Filter

B+W

67mm UV Haze Filter

Glass optic with multi-coated lens surfaces

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Optical glass and standard coatings unlikely to contain PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS

Lower concern. Optical glass filters rarely use PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

B+W Basic Clear Filter MRC

B+W

Basic Clear Filter MRC

Optical glass, multi-coated

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower PFAS concern. Optical glass filters rarely use PFAS-based coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.