40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
B+W Master Clear Filter MRC Nano

B+W · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection

B+W Master Clear Filter MRC Nano

F · High PFAS

Glass base lower concern, nano-coating composition undisclosed by brand.

Verdict: SkipGlass optical base is inert; nano-coating PFAS status unclear but typical for water-repellent films. Brand opaque on materials; no recalls or contamination reports on record.

B+W's MRC Nano uses glass with a proprietary water-repellent nano-coating. Coating chemistry unspecified; no PFAS disclosure or testing data available.

The safe swap

B+W 67mm UV Haze Filter

B+W

B+W 67mm UV Haze Filter

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Glass with water-repellent nano-coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The B+W Master Clear is a glass optical filter with a proprietary water-repellent nano-coating (MRC Nano). The glass substrate itself is chemically stable and does not leach contaminants into food, water, or contact with skin. The nano-coating's exact composition is not disclosed by B+W; such coatings often rely on silane chemistry or Teflon-family coating to achieve water-beading properties, which introduces uncertainty around PFAS content (covered separately in your PFAS grade).

The brand's record and disclosure

B+W (a division of Schneider Optics) has not published transparency reports on nano-coating chemistry or PFAS use in their optical coatings. No safety recalls, contamination incidents, or independent lab findings of hazardous substances in B+W filters are on public record. The brand's silence on coating composition limits independent verification but does not indicate a known problem.

How it compares in its category

Optical filters (camera, lighting) are a minor-exposure category compared to cookware or food packaging. Glass-based filters with hydrophobic coatings are standard across the industry; B+W is a market leader. Uncoated glass filters exist but offer less water resistance. The MRC Nano coating is competitive in durability but introduces the nano-material unknowns that define this product's risk profile.

If you buy it

Handle with care to avoid scratching the nano-coating, which can reduce performance. Clean with lens cloth or mild soap and distilled water; avoid harsh solvents that might degrade the coating. The coating should remain stable during normal storage and use at room temperature. Replace only if optical clarity degrades or coating delamination becomes visible; the filter itself has no expiration.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Nano-coating leaching or off-gassing

No reports of optical filter nano-coatings leaching into skin, water, or air under normal use. Glass does not off-gas; the coating risk is mainly if mechanically damaged or exposed to extreme heat (far outside intended use as a camera filter).

Possible

Coating degradation over time

Water-repellent nano-coatings on optics can degrade with prolonged UV exposure, humidity, or mechanical wear. B+W does not publish durability timelines; expected lifespan is typically several years with normal care. Degraded coating reduces function but does not create a direct safety hazard.

None known

Heavy metals in glass or coating

Optical glass from reputable manufacturers is formulated to avoid lead and cadmium; B+W is ISO-certified for optical products. No independent testing or recalls suggest contamination. The nano-coating composition is undisclosed but is not in contact with consumables.

None known

Microabrasion or particle shedding from coating

Well-bonded nano-coatings do not shed particles during normal use. Damage (scratching, chipping) could theoretically release coating fragments, but this is a durability issue, not a chemical hazard, and would be immediately visible.

Possible

Undisclosed PFAS in hydrophobic coating

Water-repellent nano-coatings commonly use fluorochemistry; B+W has not confirmed or denied PFAS use. As a camera filter in non-food applications, exposure to humans is negligible unless coating degrades and particles are inhaled or ingested, which is not a standard use scenario.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection

B+W 67mm UV Haze Filter

B+W

67mm UV Haze Filter

Glass optic with multi-coated lens surfaces

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Optical glass and standard coatings unlikely to contain PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS

Lower concern. Optical glass filters rarely use PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

B+W Basic Clear Filter MRC

B+W

Basic Clear Filter MRC

Optical glass, multi-coated

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower PFAS concern. Optical glass filters rarely use PFAS-based coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.