85/ 100
B
OverallC77/100
Freewell ND Filter 4-Pack for Samsung Galaxy Ultra

Samsung · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection

Freewell ND Filter 4-Pack for Samsung Galaxy Ultra

B · Low PFAS

Lower PFAS concern; optical glass filters lack typical PFAS triggers.

Verdict: BuyOptical glass and aluminum construction pose minimal chemical leaching risk; no established safety incidents on record for this product line.

ND filters are primarily optical glass with aluminum housings. No Teflon-family coating coatings or water-repellent treatments typical of PFAS exposure. Brand silent on PFAS but material composition suggests lower risk.

Shop Samsung on Amazon →

Material

Optical glass and aluminum frame

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Freewell ND filters are composed of optical-grade glass (typically borosilicate or similar low-expansion glass) bonded to an aluminum alloy frame. Optical glass is chemically inert and does not leach into food, water, or skin contact. The aluminum frame is anodized or powder-coated to prevent corrosion and metal migration, making it stable under normal use conditions as a camera lens accessory.

The brand's record and disclosure

Freewell is a smaller third-party camera accessory manufacturer; Samsung markets but does not manufacture these filters. Neither company has published detailed material safety datasheets or sustainability disclosures specific to this product line. No recalls or safety complaints are documented for Freewell ND filters. Brand transparency on chemical composition is minimal, typical of the camera accessory category.

How it compares in its category

Camera lens filters across brands (Freewell, B+W, Tiffen, Hoya) rely on similar optical glass and aluminum construction. This product sits in the mid-range for accessories and carries no known safety disadvantages versus premium alternatives. The primary differentiation is optical quality and durability, not chemical hazard profile.

If you buy it

Store filters in a dry case to prevent dust accumulation and aluminum frame corrosion. Avoid dropping or applying pressure to the glass, as cracks expose the internal optical coating. Clean only with microfiber cloth and lens cleaner; abrasive materials can degrade anti-reflection coatings. No special handling or replacement intervals are needed beyond normal wear.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Optical coating degradation

Multi-coated optical glass filters may have anti-reflection layers (typically magnesium fluoride or similar compounds). Prolonged exposure to humidity, salt spray, or scratching can degrade coatings over years, but this affects optical performance, not safety.

None known

Aluminum frame corrosion and leaching

Anodized aluminum frames are designed to prevent direct contact between aluminum and skin or lenses. No established risk of aluminum migration into food, water, or body contact from camera filter frames in normal use.

None known

Microplastic or particulate shedding

Optical glass and anodized aluminum do not shed microplastics. The frame seal and glass are inert and stable over the product lifespan.

None known

Heavy metals in optical coatings

Standard optical glass coatings (fluoride, oxide, or rare-earth compounds) do not contain lead, cadmium, or other regulated heavy metals in formulations meeting international optical standards. No established contamination in this product category.

Possible

Adhesive or bonding agents

Glass-to-frame bonding may use optical cements or epoxy adhesives. These are not in direct contact with skin or consumables and do not off-gas significantly in a dry camera accessory. No specific data on Freewell's adhesive chemistry is publicly available.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof camera & lens protection grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.