75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
The Rich Cream 15ml + Free Deluxe Samples by AUGUSTINUS BADER

Augustinus Bader · Moisturizer

The Rich Cream 15ml + Free Deluxe Samples by AUGUSTINUS BADER

C · Moderate

Lower concern, conventional luxury skincare with no known PFAS triggers, but no proactive disclosure.

Verdict: BuyEmulsion-based luxury moisturizer with no established safety red flags; standard cosmetic formulation with silent PFAS stance poses minimal practical risk.

Augustinus Bader's cream is a traditional emulsified moisturizer with no inherent PFAS applications (nonstick, water-repellency, stain resistance). Cosmetics are not typical PFAS vectors unless they contain aqueous film-forming foams or explicit water-resistant coatings, neither typical for facial creams.

Shop Augustinus Bader on Amazon →

Material

Emulsion-based moisturizer cream (oil, water, emulsifiers, actives)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Rich Cream is an oil-in-water emulsion combining humectants, plant extracts, and stabilizing emulsifiers typical of high-end moisturizers. This format (cream rather than powder or pigmented suspension) avoids the mineral contamination and heavy metal risks present in talc-based or heavily pigmented cosmetics. The 15ml size is a leave-on facial product, so absorption and skin barrier interaction are the primary exposure pathways; systemic risk from typical use is low.

The brand's record and disclosure

Augustinus Bader is a luxury skincare brand without published independent certifications (COSMOS, EWG, Clean Beauty Register) or proactive disclosure of ingredient sourcing and safety testing. The brand does not advertise formulation controversies or recalls in public records. Their silence on PFAS and preservation system specifics is typical of prestige cosmetics but reflects a lack of transparency rather than confirmed absence of concern.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the premium moisturizer segment where formulation rigor and regulatory compliance are generally strong (EU Cosmetics Regulation, FDA OTC monitoring). It lacks third-party certification or marketing of natural/clean credentials, placing it in conventional luxury rather than clean beauty positioning. Most competitors at this price point carry similar disclosure gaps.

If you buy it

Apply a pea-sized amount to clean skin; emulsion-based creams are stable at room temperature and do not require special storage beyond keeping the cap sealed to prevent water loss and microbial growth. Discontinue use if irritation develops; no heating or dilution is necessary. Replace after 12 months of opening, as water-based emulsions can support microbial growth if contaminated or stored in high-humidity bathrooms.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Luxury moisturizers typically include fragrance compounds; Augustinus Bader does not disclose a fragrance-free version or allergen profile publicly. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or compromised barrier function may experience contact irritation, though incidence in healthy skin is low.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

No publicly available formulation data confirms use of formaldehyde donors (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) in this product. EU Cosmetics Regulation limits these agents; prestige brands typically use gentler systems, but absence of label transparency prevents full verification.

None known

Talc contamination

This is a liquid-based emulsion cream without talc as a listed or typical ingredient in prestige moisturizers. No talc risk is anticipated.

Possible

Microbial growth and water-phase contamination

Emulsion-based creams contain water and require preservative systems to prevent bacterial and fungal growth over time. If the product is stored in humid environments (bathrooms) or the cap is left open, microbial colonization risk increases, though this is a storage issue rather than a manufacturing defect.

None known

Heavy metals in botanical actives or mineral pigments

No heavy metal contamination has been reported for this product or brand. Augustinus Bader formulations do not rely on mineral pigments or high-metal botanical extracts that trigger regulatory concern, but testing data is not publicly disclosed.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Moisturizer

Tatcha Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Tatcha

Starter The Ritual Set Ultra Hydrating For Dry Skin

Water-based cosmetic creams and serums; glass/plastic packaging

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern for a cosmetic moisturizer set, but Tatcha makes no public PFAS commitment.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Botanicals Orchid Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Orchid Facial Oil

plant oils, botanical extracts, glass bottle

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; facial oil with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.

Risky category by default

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

Herbivore Botanicals

Herbivore Lapis Balancing Facial Oil

plant oils, mineral pigments, glass bottle

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern for PFAS; facial oil in glass, typical formulation poses minimal risk.

Risky category by default

More moisturizer grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.