LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length vs SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf: which is safer?

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

AstroTurf

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

PFAS grade

B 85/100

Overall grade

F 63/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Synthetic turf fibers (polyethylene/polypropylene backing)

Confidence

45%

PossiblePFAS in backing or adhesives

ReportedMicroplastic shedding from fibers

PossibleLeaching from backing polymers or adhesives

Why this gradeBuy

AstroTurf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

PFAS grade

B 85/100

Overall grade

F 45/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

Polypropylene (PP) astroturf

Confidence

72%

PossibleVOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive

LikelyPolypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding

ReportedBacking adhesive failure and fiber separation

Why this gradeBuy

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More artificial turf: see the full ranking