Waterproof Case Co. · Waterproof Smartphone Cases
Procase Waterproof Phone Pouch Case
Unknown waterproof treatment; PFAS risk cannot be ruled out.
Waterproof phone pouches typically use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS. Brand makes no PFAS disclosure or safer-material claims. Insufficient information to assess risk confidently.
The safe swap
Mophie
Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
plastic pouch with unspecified waterproof coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Procase pouches are constructed from plastic (typically polyurethane or PVC blends) with an undisclosed waterproof coating or laminate. The coating formulation is the critical unknown: waterproofing treatments often rely on fluorochemicals (PFAS compounds) or silicone-based polymers to repel water and oil. Without manufacturer specification, the exact chemistry cannot be verified. If the pouch is never heated and used only to store sealed phones, leaching risk from the plastic itself is low under normal conditions.
The brand's record and disclosure
Procase (Waterproof Case Co.) does not publicly disclose material composition, coating chemistry, or PFAS avoidance commitments. No third-party certifications (e.g., Oeko-Tex, bluesign) or independent test reports are readily available for this product line. The brand has not addressed waterproofing chemistry in product documentation or sustainability statements. This silence is a red flag for consumer safety due diligence.
How it compares in its category
Phone pouches in the waterproof case category typically range from uncoated fabric (low PFAS risk, lower water resistance) to synthetic rubber or thermoplastic polyurethane with proprietary coatings (higher PFAS likelihood if not explicitly PFAS-free). Competing brands like Spigen and LifeProof have slightly more detailed material disclosures but rarely confirm PFAS-free status. Procase sits in the middle of the transparency spectrum with minimal disclosure and no competitive advantage in safety communication.
If you buy it
Store the pouch in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow any polymer degradation. Do not heat, microwave, or expose to prolonged temperatures above 60 degrees Celsius, as this could increase plastic leaching. Inspect the seams and coating annually for wear; replace if cracks, discoloration, or odor develop. Avoid storing the phone pouch directly against skin for extended periods if you have sensitive skin, in case any coating residue or plasticizers cause contact irritation.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Undisclosed waterproof coating chemistry (potential fluorochemicals/PFAS)
The waterproofing agent is not specified by the manufacturer. Fluorinated compounds (PFAS-family chemicals) are common in waterproof textiles and plastic coatings; without disclosure, PFAS presence cannot be ruled out. See separate PFAS assessment (40/100).
Plasticizer leaching from PVC or polyurethane
If the pouch material is PVC-based, phthalate plasticizers may be present. Leaching is minimal at room temperature but increases with heat or prolonged contact with oils. No data on this brand's specific formulation is publicly available.
Degradation and microplastic shedding over time
Repeated flexing, UV exposure, and temperature cycling can degrade synthetic polymer pouches, potentially releasing microplastics into stored items or the environment. The durability and degradation profile of Procase pouches is not documented in independent testing.
Coating odor and off-gassing
New waterproof pouches often emit a chemical smell from the coating or laminate, indicating volatile organic compound (VOC) release. This is typically short-lived but suggests incomplete curing or unidentified chemical components. Airing out the pouch before use is advisable.
Contact dermatitis from coating residue
No established cases of allergic reactions to Procase pouches are on record. However, undisclosed coatings or dyes in the plastic could theoretically trigger skin sensitivity in susceptible individuals, especially if the pouch touches skin directly.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Smartphone Cases
Mophie
Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15
Lithium-ion battery, plastic housing, metal contacts
No known PFAS use; battery cases rarely require fluorinated coatings.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Mophie
Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15 Pro
Lithium-ion battery, plastic housing, rubber grips
Lower concern. Battery cases lack typical PFAS-prone coatings; no public disclosure available.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Pelican
Shield Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus
Polycarbonate shell, rubber grip
Lower concern; typical phone case with no known PFAS applications.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More waterproof smartphone cases grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.