50/ 100
F
OverallF38/100
Pelican Shield MagSafe Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max

Pelican · Waterproof Smartphone Cases

Pelican Shield MagSafe Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max

F · High PFAS

Unknown polymer composition and coatings. Skip until materials fully disclosed.

Verdict: SkipPelican's silence on polymer composition and coatings creates material uncertainty; no recalls recorded, but unknown PFAS status and proprietary formula warrant cautious use pending disclosure.

Pelican does not disclose the specific polymer or surface coating materials used in this case. No public PFAS information available for this product line.

The safe swap

Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15

Mophie

Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Proprietary thermoplastic polymer with unspecified coatings

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Unknown / proprietary coating

Proprietary coating with no disclosed chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This case uses a proprietary thermoplastic polymer with unspecified surface coatings, meaning the exact resin type (TPU, polycarbonate, or hybrid blend) and any applied treatments remain undisclosed by Pelican. Thermoplastics in phone cases can leach small molecules under stress, heat, or prolonged contact with skin oils and sweat, but risk depends entirely on the specific polymer and coating formulation. Without transparency, you cannot assess whether the material may off-gas volatile compounds or degrade into microparticles over 2-3 years of heavy use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pelican is known for durable protective gear and has not faced major product safety recalls in the phone accessory market. However, the company has remained silent on material composition, restricted substance testing (including PFAS), and third-party certifications for this iPhone 17 Pro Max case. Absence of published material safety data sheets or restricted substance declarations is unusual for a premium-positioned brand and suggests either incomplete due diligence or deliberate opacity.

How it compares in its category

Premium phone cases typically use either injection-molded TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane), polycarbonate, or polycarbonate-urethane hybrids. Competitors like OtterBox and Spigen publish material compositions and PFAS commitments more openly; Pelican's refusal to detail its proprietary formula puts it below industry transparency norms. The lack of disclosure is the primary differentiator here, not performance or durability, which are likely competitive.

If you buy it

Keep the case dry and avoid prolonged exposure to direct sunlight or heat sources above 60°C (140°F), as thermoplastics can soften and off-gas at elevated temperatures. Replace the case if you notice discoloration, stickiness, or a chemical smell, which indicate polymer degradation. Clean it monthly with mild soap and water only; avoid harsh solvents or abrasive scrubbing that may accelerate coating wear. Consider requesting Pelican's material safety documentation before purchase, and pressure the brand for PFAS and restricted substance transparency.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Polymer off-gassing (VOC release)

Thermoplastics can release volatile organic compounds, especially when new or exposed to heat and UV. No off-gassing data published by Pelican; risk level unknown but not unprecedented in phone case formulations.

Possible

Coating integrity and microleaching

Unspecified surface coatings may degrade with age, friction, and contact with skin. Pelican has not disclosed what these coatings are, preventing assessment of leachable compounds.

None known

Skin irritation from proprietary additives

No documented incidents of contact dermatitis from Pelican phone cases. Risk depends on dye, plasticizer, or flame retardant content not disclosed publicly.

Possible

Microplastic shedding over time

Thermoplastic cases can fragment under repeated drops, flexing, and abrasion, creating microplastics. This is inherent to the material class and not specific to Pelican's formulation.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 25% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Smartphone Cases

Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15

Mophie

Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15

Lithium-ion battery, plastic housing, metal contacts

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

No known PFAS use; battery cases rarely require fluorinated coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15 Pro

Mophie

Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15 Pro

Lithium-ion battery, plastic housing, rubber grips

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Battery cases lack typical PFAS-prone coatings; no public disclosure available.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Pelican Shield Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus

Pelican

Shield Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus

Polycarbonate shell, rubber grip

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern; typical phone case with no known PFAS applications.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof smartphone cases grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.