70/ 100
C
OverallF52/100
Bentgo Pantry 22-Piece Airtight Food Storage Containers

Waste Free Pantry · Food Storage Containers

Bentgo Pantry 22-Piece Airtight Food Storage Containers

C · Moderate

Lower concern. Hard plastics and silicone seals typically avoid PFAS, but no explicit brand disclosure.

Verdict: BuyBPA-free polypropylene with silicone seals avoids primary plastic hazards; brand transparency limited but material class safe for cold/ambient storage.

Bentgo Pantry containers are rigid polypropylene food-storage boxes with silicone gaskets, materials not historically associated with intentional PFAS use. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or claims.

Shop Waste Free Pantry on Amazon →

Material

Plastic (BPA-free polypropylene containers) with silicone seals

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bentgo Pantry containers are polypropylene (PP, #5 plastic) with silicone gasket seals. Polypropylene is a rigid, chemically stable plastic that does not leach BPA or its replacements (BPS) under normal conditions and is rated safe for food contact by the FDA. The silicone seals are inert at room temperature and resist moisture degradation, making this material combination suitable for dry and moderately humid food storage.

The brand's record and disclosure

Waste Free Pantry (Bentgo's parent brand) markets these containers as BPA-free but has not published comprehensive material safety disclosures, third-party certifications (e.g., NSF, SCS), or responses to PFAS queries. No significant safety recalls or regulatory actions against this specific product line are publicly documented. The brand positions itself as eco-conscious but transparency on manufacturing standards and chemical testing remains minimal.

How it compares in its category

Polypropylene containers dominate the affordable food storage segment and are generally safer than older polycarbonate alternatives (which contained BPA). Bentgo Pantry sits mid-market: more transparent than unlabeled generic containers but less certified than premium brands offering NSF or FDA audits. Silicone seals are standard in this price tier and perform adequately for ambient storage; glass alternatives avoid plastic risks entirely but cost more and break easily.

If you buy it

Store only at room temperature or refrigerated; polypropylene softens above 120°F (49°C), so avoid dishwasher heat cycles and microwaving in these containers. Inspect seals annually for cracks or discoloration; silicone can degrade over 3-5 years with repeated washing. Wash by hand with mild soap and air dry to extend seal life. Replace containers if lids no longer seal effectively or if plastic shows cloudiness or stress fractures.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

BPA and BPS replacement chemicals

Manufacturer explicitly labels as BPA-free. Polypropylene formulations do not require BPA or bisphenol substitutes in production, and no public reports of BPS or other bisphenol contamination in Bentgo products exist.

None known

Phthalate plasticizers

Polypropylene is inherently rigid and does not require phthalate plasticizers for flexibility; this hazard is not relevant to this material class.

Possible

Microplastics release from container degradation

Silicone seals can shed microparticles with age and repeated thermal cycling; polypropylene containers themselves are stable under normal storage but may fragment if dropped or exposed to prolonged UV light. Risk is low for indoor pantry use but increases with wear.

Reported

Silicone gasket degradation and mold growth

Silicone seals can trap moisture and develop mold or bacterial biofilm if not fully dried after washing, especially in humid climates. This is a maintenance issue rather than a manufacturing defect; proper air drying and periodic inspection are preventive.

Possible

Leaching from polypropylene at elevated temperature

While polypropylene is stable at room temperature, heating above 120°F can accelerate migration of residual monomers or processing additives into food. Avoid microwaving or dishwasher use with these containers.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers

Caraway Food Storage Set

Caraway

Food Storage Set

Glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; glass + plastic lids with stated PFAS-free position, but no third-party verification of lid material.

Risky category by default

Caraway Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Caraway

Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern option; glass containers avoid PFAS coatings, but verify lid material before purchase.

Risky category by default

Caraway Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

Caraway

Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

borosilicate glass with non-PFAS lid

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Lower PFAS concern, glass container with stated non-PFAS lid, though third-party verification absent.

Risky category by default

More food storage containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.