70/ 100
C
OverallF52/100
OXO POP Container Baking Set

OXO · Food Storage Containers

OXO POP Container Baking Set

C · Moderate

Lower concern, basic plastic food storage without known PFAS triggers, but OXO provides no transparency on coatings or treatments.

Verdict: BuyOXO POP containers are polypropylene/polycarbonate food storage with no documented toxicity issues; standard plastic food-contact safety applies with normal use precautions.

OXO POP containers are rigid plastic storage with snap-lock lids designed for dry goods. The primary risk vectors (nonstick coatings, water-repellent treatments, stain-resistant finishes) are not typical of basic food-storage canisters.

Shop OXO on Amazon →

Material

Plastic (polypropylene/polycarbonate) food storage containers and lids

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The OXO POP Baking Set uses polypropylene (PP) for the main containers and polycarbonate (PC) or acrylic for lids/seals. Polypropylene is one of the safest plastics for food contact because it has a high melting point (around 130°C / 266°F) and does not leach BPA or phthalates under normal kitchen conditions. Polycarbonate, if present in lids, carries older concerns about bisphenol A (BPA), though modern OXO products typically use BPA-free formulations, though the company does not publicly specify this for all lines.

The brand's record and disclosure

OXO is a subsidiary of Helen of Troy and has a reputation for practical, durable kitchen products. The company has not published comprehensive chemical disclosure statements or third-party certifications (such as NSF or FDA compliance documentation) readily available to consumers. No major recalls or contamination incidents specific to the POP container line are documented in public safety databases. OXO remains silent on PFAS treatments or coatings, which is typical for mainstream food storage brands but leaves a transparency gap.

How it compares in its category

OXO POP containers occupy the mid-range of the food storage market. They are more affordable than glass alternatives and more durable than thin single-use plastics, but offer less transparency than premium brands like Pyrex (glass) or Rubbermaid Brilliance (which publishes material specs). Compared to budget PP containers, OXO's design and seal quality are notably stronger, reducing the risk of lid degradation and microparticle release over time.

If you buy it

Do not microwave these containers unless the label explicitly permits it; polycarbonate lids can degrade under heat. Store dry goods (flour, sugar, baking supplies) rather than acidic or fatty foods for extended periods, as plastics can absorb odors and flavors. Hand-wash with warm water and mild soap; avoid abrasive scrubbers that scratch the surface. Replace containers every 3-5 years or if lids no longer seal tightly, as wear can compromise freshness and invite microbial growth.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Bisphenol A (BPA) / Bisphenol S (BPS) migration

OXO has not disclosed whether lids contain BPA or BPS. Polycarbonate used in some OXO lids may have carried BPA in older formulations, but modern batches are assumed BPA-free by industry standard. No leaching incidents are documented for this product line.

None known

Phthalate plasticizers

Polypropylene does not require phthalates for flexibility. If polycarbonate or acrylic is used in lids or seals, phthalates are unlikely in food-contact formulations subject to FDA oversight, but OXO does not confirm absence.

Possible

Microplastic shedding from wear

Repeated opening/closing and hand-washing can cause fine plastic particles to detach from the container edges and seals over time, especially if lids are used roughly or stored in damp conditions. Risk is low with normal use but increases with product age.

Possible

Lid seal degradation leading to mold or bacterial growth

OXO POP lids use silicone or rubber gaskets that can crack, shrink, or lose elasticity after 3-5 years of use or exposure to dishwasher heat. A compromised seal allows moisture and contaminants to enter stored foods, especially in baking mixes prone to absorbing humidity.

Reported

Chemical absorption and odor/flavor transfer

Polypropylene absorbs volatile compounds from strong-smelling foods and cleaning products over time. OXO containers are not immune to this; extended storage of spiced or acidic foods may leave persistent odors and taste residue in the plastic, though no toxicity results directly.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers

Caraway Food Storage Set

Caraway

Food Storage Set

Glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; glass + plastic lids with stated PFAS-free position, but no third-party verification of lid material.

Risky category by default

Caraway Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Caraway

Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern option; glass containers avoid PFAS coatings, but verify lid material before purchase.

Risky category by default

Caraway Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

Caraway

Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

borosilicate glass with non-PFAS lid

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Lower PFAS concern, glass container with stated non-PFAS lid, though third-party verification absent.

Risky category by default

More food storage containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.