75/ 100
C
OverallF61/100
Toms Toms Flat Floss Sprment 32yd

Tom's of Maine · Dental Floss

Toms Toms Flat Floss Sprment 32yd

C · Moderate

Lower-concern product; dental floss is not a typical PFAS vector, but Tom's of Maine does not publicly disclose material composition.

Verdict: BuyTom's of Maine dental floss carries minimal established safety risk; no public recalls or hazard reports; PFAS status unclear but not a typical floss concern vector.

Dental floss lacks the functional coatings (water-repellent, grease-resistant, nonstick) that typically require PFAS. Tom's of Maine is known for natural/minimal-chemical positioning but makes no explicit PFAS claim. No lab data exists for this specific product, and the brand does not disclose detailed floss composition publicly.

Shop Tom's of Maine on Amazon →

Material

Dental floss (string fiber, likely nylon or similar polymer)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Tom's of Maine Flat Floss is a polymer-based dental floss, most likely nylon or a nylon blend, designed to be thicker and wider than traditional round floss for easier handling. The exact composition is not publicly disclosed by the brand. Flat floss geometry itself poses no unique chemical hazard compared to round alternatives; the polymer base (whether nylon or similar synthetic) does not release significant compounds during normal use in the oral cavity, where contact is brief and wet.

The brand's record and disclosure

Tom's of Maine is owned by Colgate-Palmolive and markets itself as a natural-focused personal care brand with some certifications (e.g., Leaping Bunny cruelty-free). However, the company does not publicly disclose material composition, sourcing, or PFAS status for this floss product. No recalls or established safety incidents are on record. The brand's silence on polymer-specific safety is typical across the dental floss category, where regulatory oversight is minimal.

How it compares in its category

Dental floss is a low-exposure, short-contact-time product that generates minimal hazard compared to cookware, food storage, or cosmetics applied to skin. Tom's flat floss occupies the mid-market segment alongside brands like Glide and Oral-B; all mainstream flosses use similar synthetic polymers with no known safety differentiation. Natural or silk alternatives exist but are not inherently safer and cost more. This product is typical and poses typical (minimal) risk.

If you buy it

Use as directed: dispense floss, wrap around fingers, guide between teeth with gentle sawing motion, and discard after use. Do not swallow floss. Store in a dry place away from heat. No special maintenance is required. Replace the spool when exhausted or if the floss becomes frayed. There are no heating limits, special care instructions, or degradation concerns specific to this product during normal oral use.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Polymer composition / leaching

Nylon and similar synthetic polymers used in dental floss are stable in the oral cavity and do not leach significant chemical compounds during brief contact with saliva and teeth. No evidence of monomer or additive migration in the floss category.

None known

Microplastic shedding

Dental floss is designed to be strong and does not fragment during normal use. Ingestion of intact or microscopic floss fibers is not a documented hazard; any fibers swallowed are inert and pass through the GI tract.

None known

Dye or colorant toxicity

Tom's Flat Floss is typically white or clear; no heavy metals or azo dyes are typical in dental floss products. No public incidents of dye-related harm from this or similar products are on record.

Possible

Choking or mechanical injury

As with all floss, improper use or swallowing of long strands poses a theoretical choking or GI tract entanglement risk, particularly in young children. This is a user-error hazard, not a product defect.

Reported

Material disclosure gap

Tom's of Maine does not publicly specify polymer type, additives, or processing methods. This opacity makes independent safety assessment difficult, though no specific hazard is known or suspected.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Cocofloss Refill Trio

Cocofloss

Refill Trio

Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.

Risky category by default

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Dental Lace

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Dental Lace

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.