75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Vegan Peppermint Anywhere Floss 20 Pack

Radius · Dental Floss

Vegan Peppermint Anywhere Floss 20 Pack

C · Moderate

Lower concern; vegan floss has minimal PFAS risk but brand makes no transparency commitment.

Verdict: BuyPlant-based floss with minimal chemical hazards; no brand red flags on record; safe routine dental care item.

Radius Vegan Peppermint Floss is made from plant-based materials without obvious PFAS-prone coatings (no nonstick, waterproof, or stain-resist claims). The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or make any PFAS-free claims. Floss is a low-risk product category overall, but lack of brand transparency limits confidence.

Shop Radius on Amazon →

Material

Plant-based floss (likely cellulose or silk)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Radius Vegan Peppermint Anywhere Floss is plant-based, typically cellulose or plant-derived fiber rather than nylon or silk. Plant cellulose fibers do not leach problematic chemicals into the mouth during normal use because they are insoluble and cleared quickly. The peppermint flavoring is applied topically to the fiber and represents a minor contact hazard only for individuals with mint sensitivity or severe oral ulcers.

The brand's record and disclosure

Radius is known for emphasizing natural and sustainable dental products but does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or third-party chemical testing results for this product. No recalls, safety violations, or contamination reports are on record for Radius floss. The brand markets this as vegan and plant-based but does not explicitly address manufacturing process safeguards or testing for heavy metals or residual pesticides in the cellulose source.

How it compares in its category

Plant-based floss avoids synthetic polymer hazards (microplastics, Teflon-type coating, nylon breakdown) present in conventional nylon floss. It ranks favorably alongside silk floss on chemical safety but lacks the long-term durability data of traditional alternatives. Cellulose-based floss is biodegradable, reducing post-use environmental persistence, though this does not affect in-mouth safety.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place to prevent fiber degradation or moisture absorption that could promote mold in the container. Use as directed for routine interdental cleaning; discontinue use if mouth irritation develops around the peppermint flavoring. Plant-based floss may fray slightly more than nylon, so inspect the dispenser design for ease of cutting and handling. Replace the pack when floss becomes dry, brittle, or visibly discolored.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Peppermint flavoring allergens or irritants

Topical peppermint oil or menthol may trigger contact sensitivity, oral ulceration, or allergic reaction in individuals with mint allergies or pre-existing mouth wounds. This is not a systemic toxicant but a localized irritation risk.

None known

Pesticide residues in plant fiber source

Radius does not publicly disclose whether source cellulose or plant fibers are certified organic or tested for agrochemical residues. Risk is theoretical but unquantified by available brand disclosure.

None known

Heavy metal contamination in cellulose or dyes

No recalls or test results on record for lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in Radius plant-based floss. Cellulose is generally low-risk, but manufacturing and coloring processes are not detailed publicly.

None known

Formaldehyde-based binding or preservation agents

Plant-based floss typically does not require formaldehyde resins, but brand documentation does not explicitly confirm absence. Exposure risk would be minimal even if present, given brief oral contact and rapid clearance.

Possible

Microbial growth in moist floss pack

Cellulose fibers absorb moisture; if stored in humid conditions or kept open, fungal or bacterial colonization could occur on the floss itself. Proper closure and dry storage mitigate this routine hazard.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Cocofloss Refill Trio

Cocofloss

Refill Trio

Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.

Risky category by default

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Dental Lace

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Dental Lace

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.