Tom's of Maine · Toothpaste
Tom's of Maine Antiplaque Whitening Toothpaste
Lower PFAS concern, toothpaste formula has no routine need for PFAS; skip if you want explicit assurance.
Tom's of Maine antiplaque whitening toothpaste contains no known PFAS-prone ingredients (no water-resistant coatings, nonstick surfaces, or grease-resistant packaging). The brand does not publicly claim PFAS-free status or hold third-party verification.
Shop Tom's of Maine on Amazon →Material
water-based gel with sorbitol, hydrated silica, fluoride compound
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Tom's of Maine Antiplaque Whitening Toothpaste is a water-based gel formulation built on sorbitol (sweetener and humectant), hydrated silica (mild abrasive for whitening), and a fluoride compound (sodium fluoride or sodium monofluorophosphate, depending on variant) for cavity and plaque control. The abrasive silica level is typical for whitening toothpastes and considered safe for daily use at standard brushing intensity. No evidence suggests the fluoride compound itself poses bioaccumulation or systemic toxicity risk at normal toothpaste exposure levels (swallowing is minimized in adult use).
The brand's record and disclosure
Tom's of Maine is owned by Colgate-Palmolive and has maintained a reputation for ingredient transparency and natural positioning. The brand publishes ingredient lists and has achieved Natural Products Association and non-GMO certifications on many lines. No major safety recalls or established formulation controversies are on record for this specific product. The brand does not explicitly advertise PFAS absence, but toothpaste formulations have no functional need for PFAS additives, making absence likely though unconfirmed by public statement.
How it compares in its category
Tom's of Maine positions itself in the premium natural toothpaste segment with higher ingredient scrutiny than mass-market alternatives; most conventional whitening toothpastes use identical or more abrasive silica systems. Fluoride levels in this product align with FDA-approved concentrations (typically 1000-1500 ppm), matching standard options. The sorbitol-based formulation is gentler on enamel than some peroxide-heavy whitening products and avoids sodium lauryl sulfate, a common irritant in cheaper brands.
If you buy it
Use once or twice daily with normal brushing technique; do not intentionally ingest beyond incidental swallowing of small amounts (especially important if children under 6 use it, where swallowing risk is higher). Store tube at room temperature away from direct heat or sunlight to preserve gel consistency and prevent any potential separation. Replace tube every 3-4 months or when empty; there is no degradation window that creates safety concern if stored normally. Discontinue if you notice mouth sensitivity or gum irritation and consult a dentist.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fluoride systemic toxicity (ingestion risk)
At normal adult use (spitting out most product), fluoride exposure is minimal and within safe margins. Risk rises only with chronic intentional swallowing or use by children under 6 without supervision; standard toothpaste concentrations (1000-1500 ppm) are FDA-approved for daily adult use.
Silica abrasive enamel wear
Hydrated silica at whitening-toothpaste concentrations is well-established as safe for enamel at normal brushing pressure. No published data links Tom's of Maine silica levels to enamel damage beyond what occurs with any standard whitening paste.
Sorbitol digestive effect (minor ingestion)
Sorbitol is a non-nutritive sweetener that can cause mild laxative effects if swallowed in large amounts; this is not a concern for normal toothpaste use where spitting is expected, but relevant if young children chronically ingest the product.
Fragrance/flavoring sensitization
Tom's of Maine uses mint and natural flavoring compounds typical of toothpastes; no specific allergen alerts or formulation changes are on record for this product. Individuals with mint sensitivity may experience mild irritation or flavor aversion.
Microplastics contamination
This gel-based formulation does not contain microbeads (common in older scrub toothpastes). The formulation relies on hydrated silica particles for abrasion, which are mineral-derived and do not present microplastic pollution risk.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Toothpaste
Davids
Toothpaste
natural mineral-based formula (calcium carbonate, hydroxyapatite)
Lower PFAS concern; natural formula toothpaste with clean ingredient transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Davids
Natural Toothpaste Peppermint Charcoal
Charcoal, glycerin, hydrated silica, natural flavor, mineral base
Lower-concern toothpaste; charcoal formulation has no inherent PFAS risk and carries third-party safety certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Native
Fluoride Free Toothpaste
toothpaste base: glycerin, xylitol, silica; fluoride-free formula
Lower PFAS concern; fluoride-free formulation and standard toothpaste ingredients present negligible PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
More toothpaste grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.