Taste of the Wild · Pet Food Bags
Taste of the Wild High Prairie Dry Dog Food
Lower-concern pet food packaging; no red flags, but brand offers no PFAS transparency.
Taste of the Wild's High Prairie kibble uses standard paper-based dry food packaging with no known use of PFAS-bearing nonstick or water-repellent coatings. The brand does not disclose PFAS testing or make PFAS-free claims.
Shop Taste of the Wild on Amazon →Material
paper/cardboard bag with standard interior coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Taste of the Wild High Prairie comes in a paper/cardboard bag with a polymer-based interior moisture barrier, a standard construction for dry pet foods. The interior coating prevents moisture ingress and oil migration from the kibble into the outer paper, which is essential for shelf stability and preventing rancidity. No PVC or chlorine-based polymers are typically used in premium pet food bags; most employ polyethylene or polypropylene-based liners. This material combination is food-contact approved under FDA guidelines when used for pet food packaging.
The brand's record and disclosure
Taste of the Wild (owned by Diamond Pet Foods) has no major recall history related to packaging hazards and maintains reasonable transparency about ingredient sourcing and manufacturing. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS content in packaging, consistent with most pet food manufacturers who treat this as proprietary or non-disclosed information. No major certifications specific to packaging sustainability or chemical reduction are promoted; the brand focuses primarily on ingredient quality messaging.
How it compares in its category
Dry pet food bags are among the lower-risk food contact materials because the product is shelf-stable, unheated, and not moisture-intensive during use. Taste of the Wild's bag construction is typical for premium dry dog foods and does not stand out as either exceptionally safe or concerning relative to competitor brands like Orijen, Acana, or Primal. The paper exterior and polymer liner represent industry standard practice; concerns about interior coatings are minimal because direct contact duration is finite and the product is dry.
If you buy it
Store the bag in a cool, dry location away from direct sunlight and heat sources to prevent polymer coating degradation and odor permeation. Once opened, transfer remaining kibble into an airtight glass or food-grade plastic container within 2-3 weeks to prevent oxidation and maintain freshness, regardless of bag integrity. Inspect the bag for tears, punctures, or signs of moisture before use; discard if the interior coating appears compromised. Do not microwave, heat, or compress the bag, as this is unnecessary and may stress the polymer liner.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Interior polymer coating degradation
Polyethylene or polypropylene liners can degrade if exposed to heat, UV light, or prolonged storage in humid environments, potentially allowing moisture into the kibble. Risk is mitigated by proper storage conditions and is not a defect in manufacturing; degradation occurs over time or due to mishandling.
Mineral oil or petroleum-derived release agents in coating
Some bag liners use mineral oil-based release agents to prevent sticking during manufacturing. Taste of the Wild bags show no established complaints or recalls linked to this, and any residual amounts would be minimal and below regulatory concern for pet food contact.
Ink migration from exterior printing
Pet food bag printing typically uses food-contact-safe inks, but indirect contact between exterior graphics and kibble is theoretically possible if the barrier layer is compromised. No incidents are recorded for this brand; ink migration risk is negligible with intact packaging.
Allergen cross-contact via bag reuse
If the empty bag is reused for storage of human food or other materials, residual kibble dust or oils could contaminate other products. This is a use-phase concern, not a manufacturing defect; proper disposal of bags after use eliminates risk.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More pet food bags grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.