70/ 100
C
OverallF62/100
Royal Canin Health Nutrition Medium Adult Dry Dog Food

Royal Canin · Pet Food Bags

Royal Canin Health Nutrition Medium Adult Dry Dog Food

C · Moderate

Lower concern, but Royal Canin makes no PFAS disclosure on packaging materials.

Verdict: BuyPet food bag material poses no established chemical hazards; brand has solid quality record and no major recalls tied to packaging safety.

Royal Canin does not publicly disclose PFAS-related information for this dry dog food's packaging. The product uses a standard multi-layer kraft paper bag typical of pet food, materials not inherently linked to PFAS in dry-goods applications.

Shop Royal Canin on Amazon →

Material

kraft/paper bag with standard polymer liner

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Royal Canin Medium Adult bags use kraft paper as the outer layer with a standard polyethylene or polypropylene polymer liner inside, a common industry construction. The liner creates a moisture barrier to protect kibble from humidity and oxidation, while the paper exterior provides structural rigidity. This two-layer design is chemically inert under normal storage conditions; neither kraft nor standard polyolefins leach into dry kibble at room temperature. The food itself does not come into direct contact with the polymer layer except at the bag seams.

The brand's record and disclosure

Royal Canin, owned by Mars Petcare, maintains ISO 9001 quality certification and conducts third-party ingredient audits, though it does not publish detailed packaging material safety data sheets to consumers. The brand has no widely documented recalls specifically tied to packaging contamination or chemical migration in this product line. However, Royal Canin remains silent on PFAS use in bag manufacturing and does not offer voluntary packaging transparency statements, which is typical for the pet food industry but leaves uncertainty about per- and polyfluoroalkyl compound exposure from the barrier layer.

How it compares in its category

Pet food bags across the industry (Purina, Hill's, Iams) use nearly identical kraft-polymer laminate construction and share the same disclosure gaps around PFAS and barrier chemicals. Royal Canin's bags are neither notably safer nor riskier than mainstream competitors in material terms. Brands offering organic or grain-free formulas typically use the same packaging materials, so switching formulas does not reduce packaging-related chemical exposure. Premium boutique brands occasionally use paper-only bags without polymer liners, but this eliminates the moisture barrier and increases kibble degradation risk.

If you buy it

Store bags in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight and extreme heat; polymer liners can soften above 140F, though this is unlikely in typical home storage. Once opened, transfer kibble to a sealed glass or food-grade plastic container to prevent rancidity and limit continued polymer exposure from the original bag. Discard bags after 6-8 weeks of opening, as kibble fat oxidation accelerates once moisture enters. Do not microwave or heat the bag itself, and keep it away from direct flame or heating elements.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Polymer liner off-gassing (VOC/odor)

No published cases of volatile organic compound emissions from polyethylene or polypropylene liners in sealed pet food bags at room temperature. Off-gassing is negligible in intact, cool-stored bags.

Possible

Moisture barrier integrity degradation

Over time (12+ months), polymer liners can develop micro-perforations or seam separation, allowing humidity ingress and kibble spoilage. This is a food-quality issue rather than a chemical safety hazard, but degraded bags should be discarded.

None known

Ink or adhesive migration from printed paper exterior

Royal Canin uses food-contact-approved inks and adhesives on the exterior kraft layer; no direct contact occurs between printing and kibble due to the inner polymer barrier. No reported contamination cases.

Possible

Thermal degradation of polymer liner (if heated)

Exposing sealed bags to sustained temperatures above 140F (60C) can cause polyethylene or polypropylene to soften and may release trace monomers. Unlikely in normal home storage but can occur if bags are left in cars, attics, or near heaters during winter.

None known

Heavy metals in kibble ingredients (independent of packaging)

Royal Canin conducts ingredient testing for contaminants including heavy metals; no public findings of lead, cadmium, or arsenic in this product line. This is a formulation control issue, not a packaging hazard.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 62% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More pet food bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.