Taste of the Wild · Pet Food Bags
Taste of the Wild Ancient Prairie Dog Food
Lower concern pet food packaging; no known PFAS use in commodity kibble bags, but brand offers no transparency.
Taste of the Wild packages this dry dog food in standard paper/board composite bags typical of the pet food industry. No public evidence links this brand or product format to PFAS-containing coatings.
Shop Taste of the Wild on Amazon →Material
Paper/cardboard bag with potential polymer film lining
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Taste of the Wild Ancient Prairie uses a paper/cardboard exterior bag with an inner polymer film barrier, typical for dry pet food preservation. The polymer lining (likely polyethylene or polypropylene) serves as a moisture and oxygen barrier to maintain kibble freshness and prevent rancidity. Pet food bags do not require the heat resistance or non-stick properties that trigger hazardous coatings in human cookware, so materials are simpler and lower-risk than human food packaging.
The brand's record and disclosure
Taste of the Wild (Diamond Pet Foods subsidiary) does not publicly disclose packaging material composition or PFAS testing. The brand has no major recalls tied to packaging hazards on record. No third-party certifications for sustainable or low-chemical packaging are evident. Silence on PFAS and materials reflects industry norm for pet food makers rather than a specific red flag.
How it compares in its category
Pet food bags are lower-stakes than human food or beverage packaging because kibble does not leach chemicals the way acidic foods or liquids do, and pets do not ingest the bag material itself. Taste of the Wild bags are comparable to mainstream competitors (Purina, Orijen, Acana) in construction. No evidence suggests this brand uses atypical coatings, inks, or adhesives that would elevate risk above category baseline.
If you buy it
Store bags in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to minimize any potential polymer off-gassing and to preserve kibble quality. Use within the printed shelf life; do not reuse bags for human food storage or water. Once opened, reseal by folding and clipping the top, or transfer kibble to airtight pet food containers to maintain freshness. Inspect bags on arrival for punctures or damage; minor surface wear is normal and does not affect safety.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Polymer film lining degradation and microparticles
No established risk of microplastic shedding into dry kibble from intact polyethylene/polypropylene film. Kibble itself does not chemically degrade the lining under normal storage.
Ink and adhesive migration
Printing inks and bag sealing adhesives are food-contact compliant in commercial pet food bags. No recalls or hazard reports for Taste of the Wild bags specifically. Pet kibble does not absorb inks the way moist or oily foods might.
Bacterial or mold growth in lining seams
If bags are stored in high humidity or punctured, interior seams can harbor moisture and mold, risking kibble contamination. This is a storage and handling issue, not a material defect of the bag itself.
Lead or heavy metals in bag inks or closures
Commercial pet food bags in North America are subject to FDA indirect food additive rules. No trace metal concerns specific to Taste of the Wild bags have surfaced. Printed areas do not contact kibble directly.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 68% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More pet food bags grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.