Tarte · Deodorant
SET 01
Lower-concern cosmetic; no known PFAS triggers, but Tarte makes no public PFAS commitment.
Tarte's SET 01 pressed powder uses mineral pigments and is talc-free, standard cosmetic ingredients with no established PFAS risk category. Tarte does not publicly disclose PFAS policies or pursue third-party verification.
Shop Tarte on Amazon →Material
Pressed powder (talc-free, mineral pigments)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Tarte SET 01 is a pressed powder deodorant formulated without talc, using mineral pigments instead. The talc-free claim eliminates the primary asbestos-contamination risk associated with talc-based powders. Mineral pigments (typically iron oxides, mica, titanium dioxide) are inert, insoluble compounds with low skin-penetration risk when applied topically to underarm skin. Pressed powder formulation means no volatilization or inhalation hazard from airborne particles during normal use.
The brand's record and disclosure
Tarte is known for transparency on harmful ingredient exclusions (phthalates, parabens, mineral oil) but makes no public PFAS commitment or third-party certification claim for this product. The brand has not faced recalled deodorants for heavy-metal or formaldehyde contamination. No independent testing results for SET 01 specifically are publicly available; safety assessment relies on material-class standards and ingredient declarations.
How it compares in its category
Talc-free mineral-powder deodorants are a low-toxicity segment within cosmetics. SET 01 sits favorably vs. aerosol or aluminum-based antiperspirants (which carry dermal-absorption concerns) but offers no antimicrobial claim, so efficacy depends on mineral odor-control only. Compared to activated-charcoal or clay deodorants, mineral pigment formulas carry lower risk of skin irritation or heavy-metal leaching.
If you buy it
Apply to clean, dry underarm skin; powder deodorants require reapplication within 8-12 hours in humid conditions. Do not inhale directly during application. Replace if the pressed cake develops visible mold or odor changes (sign of bacterial growth in humid bathrooms). Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent pigment degradation.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Talc contamination (asbestos risk)
Product explicitly formulated talc-free; asbestos risk does not apply to mineral-pigment base.
Heavy metals in mineral pigments
Iron oxides, mica, and titanium dioxide are standard cosmetic-grade minerals with no established lead, cadmium, or chromium risk at typical use levels; no recalls or test failures on record for Tarte deodorants.
Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives
Powder deodorants have minimal water content and do not require strong antimicrobial systems; Tarte's ingredient list does not typically include formaldehyde donors, though full formulation not public.
Fragrance allergens or undisclosed sensitizers
Product may contain fragrance; Tarte does not disclose allergen-inducing scent components. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity should patch-test or request full ingredient list before full-body use.
Bacterial or fungal growth in pressed cake
Powder formulations can accumulate moisture and bacteria in humid bathroom environments if improperly stored or if skin is moist during application. Risk is use-dependent, not formulation-dependent.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.