100/ 100
A
OverallA92/100
Tom's of Maine Back to Nature Bundle

Tom's of Maine · Deodorant

Tom's of Maine Back to Nature Bundle

A · Very low PFAS

Lower-concern cosmetics with natural positioning and third-party natural certifications; no known PFAS risks typical of this category.

Verdict: BuyNatural deodorant with PFAS-free formulation, third-party certifications, and no established safety controversies; safe for routine use.

Tom's of Maine cosmetics are formulated without synthetic chemical coatings or water-resistant treatments that typically introduce PFAS. The brand markets natural ingredients and holds MADE SAFE certification, which screens against PFAS.

Brand says: “Tom's of Maine is committed to natural ingredients and does not use PFAS in formulations; products carry natural/organic certifications

MADE SAFELeaping Bunny
Shop Tom's of Maine on Amazon →

Material

natural cosmetic actives, mineral pigments, plant-based

Brand disclosure

Brand claims PFAS-free

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

Third-party PFAS-free verification

Independently verified PFAS-free by a third party.

Helps the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Tom's of Maine Back to Nature uses plant-based actives (typically magnesium hydroxide or mineral salts) instead of aluminum antiperspirants, combined with natural oils and mineral pigments for texture and mild antimicrobial effect. The absence of synthetic preservatives and petroleum-derived ingredients reduces exposure to endocrine disruptors common in conventional deodorants. This formulation class avoids the aluminum absorption and neurotoxicity concerns associated with antiperspirant-strength products, though effectiveness for sweat control is lower by design.

The brand's record and disclosure

Tom's of Maine holds B Corp certification and has made explicit PFAS-free commitments across its personal care line; third-party certifications include Natural and Non-GMO Project Verified on many products. The brand has historically disclosed ingredient sourcing and manufacturing practices transparently, with no major recalls or safety violations on record for deodorant products. Parent company Colgate-Palmolive acquired Tom's in 2006 but has maintained the natural positioning and certification standards.

How it compares in its category

Natural mineral deodorants like Tom's occupy the lower-risk end of the deodorant spectrum, avoiding synthetic fragrance overload and antiperspirant aluminum while using simpler, lower-complexity ingredient lists than conventional brands. They typically trade antiperspirant potency for reduced systemic absorption and fewer chemical interactions. Within the natural deodorant category, Tom's competes fairly on transparency and certification density, though some premium brands (e.g., Schmidt's) use similar formulations with comparable safety profiles.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin; do not use on broken or irritated underarm skin, as mineral deodorants can cause minor irritation in sensitive individuals. Reapply after heavy sweating or bathing; natural formulations are water-soluble and less persistent than synthetic alternatives. If you experience redness or itching, discontinue use and test on a small area first, as some plant oils or mineral components may trigger contact dermatitis in a small subset of users. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent caking.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Tom's of Maine Back to Nature typically includes natural essential oils and fragrance compounds; while labeled 'natural,' these can trigger contact dermatitis or allergic sensitization in individuals with fragrance sensitivities or underlying eczema.

None known

Heavy metals in mineral pigments

Mineral deodorants use talc or mica-based colorants; no published testing or recalls have identified lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in Tom's products, and the topical application and brief contact window present minimal absorption risk.

None known

Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

Tom's natural positioning and third-party certifications (Natural, Non-GMO) exclude formaldehyde donors; ingredient lists do not include imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin, or quaternium-15.

Possible

1,4-dioxane contamination

Deodorants using certain emulsifiers or thickeners (e.g., cetyl ethoxylates) can carry trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct; no specific testing of this product has been published, but risk is generally lower in formulae prioritizing botanical ingredients.

None known

Talc-associated asbestos or respirable silica

If the product uses talc as a bulking or absorptive agent, FDA enforcement and industry testing have not flagged asbestos in recent Tom's formulations; however, consumers with talc sensitivity or those using talc-based deodorants chronically may wish to prefer mica alternatives.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.