70/ 100
C
OverallF58/100
Stasher Premium Silicone Reusable Food Storage Lunch Starter Kit

Stasher · Food Storage Containers

Stasher Premium Silicone Reusable Food Storage Lunch Starter Kit

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern, silicone food storage avoids common PFAS-prone coatings, but no public PFAS disclosure from brand.

Verdict: BuyFood-grade silicone avoids common leaching hazards; no reported contamination issues; brand transparency limited but product safety record clean.

Stasher's silicone containers use a material class that does not typically require PFAS-based treatments for water or grease resistance. However, Stasher has not publicly claimed PFAS-free status or sought third-party verification.

Shop Stasher on Amazon →

Material

Food-grade silicone

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Stasher bags are made from food-grade silicone, a synthetic rubber polymer that does not contain BPA, phthalates, or PVC. Silicone is chemically inert across typical food storage temperatures (freezer to microwave reheat), meaning it does not leach plasticizers or endocrine disruptors into food the way some plastics do. The material is non-porous, reducing bacterial colonization risk compared to cloth or wood alternatives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Stasher does not publicly disclose detailed testing data, manufacturing standards, or third-party certifications (e.g., NSF, SGS) on their website. The brand claims FDA compliance and food-grade certification but provides no verifiable documentation link. No major product recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this product line. The company's silence on PFAS testing is consistent with many silicone-container makers but limits independent verification.

How it compares in its category

Silicone food storage is safer than polycarbonate (BPA risk) and polyvinyl chloride (phthalate leaching), but comparable in safety to borosilicate glass and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Unlike glass, silicone offers durability and ease of use. Unlike plastic wrap and paper bags, silicone avoids single-use waste and associated manufacturing contaminants. Price sits at a premium, reflecting the material cost.

If you buy it

Do not heat sealed silicone bags above 400°F (204°C) to avoid degradation; microwave reheating with bags open is safe. Hand wash in warm soapy water or run on top rack of dishwasher; avoid harsh abrasives that scratch the surface. Replace bags if seams separate, discoloration appears, or odors persist after washing. Store flat or rolled in a cool, dry cabinet to extend lifespan (typically 5+ years with normal use).

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Silicone leaching at high temperatures

While food-grade silicone is chemically stable at normal cooking and storage temperatures, prolonged exposure above 400°F or repeated heating in direct flame may cause minor degradation and release of trace oligomers. Risk is low for standard microwave or dishwasher use.

Possible

Bacterial growth in seams and seals

Silicone bags have sealed seams that can trap moisture and food particles if not thoroughly cleaned. Improper drying or storage in humid conditions may allow mold or bacterial biofilm growth; regular hand inspection and air drying mitigate this.

None known

Color additives and pigment safety

Stasher bags are typically offered in multiple colors (clear, pastel, dark). No published testing for heavy metals (cadmium, lead) in dyes has been found. Food-grade silicone typically uses safer colorants than non-food plastics, but brand does not disclose pigment sources.

None known

Microplastic shedding

Silicone is not prone to fragmentation or microplastic release like degraded polycarbonate or polyethylene. No data suggests Stasher bags shed microparticles during normal use or washing.

Possible

Odor retention and off-gassing

Silicone can absorb and retain strong food odors (garlic, fish, curry); some users report persistent smells. This is a usability issue rather than a safety hazard, but indicates porous characteristics that may harbor residual bacteria if not cleaned thoroughly.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers

Caraway Food Storage Set

Caraway

Food Storage Set

Glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; glass + plastic lids with stated PFAS-free position, but no third-party verification of lid material.

Risky category by default

Caraway Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Caraway

Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern option; glass containers avoid PFAS coatings, but verify lid material before purchase.

Risky category by default

Caraway Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

Caraway

Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

borosilicate glass with non-PFAS lid

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Lower PFAS concern, glass container with stated non-PFAS lid, though third-party verification absent.

Risky category by default

More food storage containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.