45/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Protectme Premium Fabric Protector

Spray & Wash · Fabric Treatment Sprays

Protectme Premium Fabric Protector

F · High PFAS

Skip until formulation details disclosed or third-party testing available.

Verdict: SkipModerate PFAS concern and proprietary formula opacity warrant caution; use only if label safety data disclosed, avoid on items worn near face or by children.

Spray & Wash's fabric protector uses an undisclosed coating formula designed for water and stain resistance, common uses for PFAS chemistry. No PFAS claim, certification, or public lab data available to confirm safety.

The safe swap

Murphy Oil Soap Wood Cleaner Spray Orange 22 oz.

Murphy Oil Soap

Murphy Oil Soap Wood Cleaner Spray Orange 22 oz.

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Proprietary fabric treatment coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Spray & Wash Protectme Premium is a fabric treatment coating with a proprietary formulation, typical of water and stain repellents that function by creating a hydrophobic barrier on fibers. The exact chemistry is undisclosed by the brand, which prevents independent assessment of whether it contains traditional Teflon-type coating-based (fluorocarbon) repellents or newer non-fluorinated alternatives. Proprietary formulations in this category often rely on silicone, wax, or synthetic polymers as the active ingredient, but without transparency, end users cannot verify safer chemistry.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spray & Wash, owned by SC Johnson, has not published detailed ingredient lists or safety data sheets for this product in consumer-accessible formats, which is a significant transparency gap for a fabric treatment meant for frequent use on clothing and home textiles. The brand's silence on PFAS content and formulation chemistry makes independent hazard assessment difficult. SC Johnson has faced scrutiny over PFAS use in other household products, though no specific recalls of this product are on public record. No third-party certifications (e.g., Oeko-Tex, GOTS, or fluorine-free claims) are advertised for this product.

How it compares in its category

Fabric protectors occupy a middle ground: they are less regulated than cosmetics and personal care items but more visible than hidden ingredient additives. Many competitor products (e.g., Scotchgard, Guardsman) similarly withhold full formulation details, making the category as a whole opaque on PFAS and other coat-related hazards. Some brands now market PFAS-free or fluorine-free versions; Protectme Premium makes no such claim, placing it in a riskier cohort. The proprietary approach is standard industry practice but increases consumer risk when hazard data is not independently verified.

If you buy it

Apply in well-ventilated areas only (outdoors preferred) and avoid inhalation of spray mist. Do not apply to items worn directly on skin, near the face, or intended for infants or young children until dry and offgassed. Test on an inconspicuous area first to check for discoloration or texture change. Reapply after heavy use or washing; do not assume single application lasts indefinitely. If you notice any skin irritation, respiratory discomfort, or persistent odor, discontinue use and seek label or manufacturer contact information.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and inhalation risk

Spray fabric treatments typically emit solvent vapors during and shortly after application. Without ingredient transparency, the presence and concentration of VOCs cannot be confirmed, but spray delivery format means direct respiratory exposure is probable during use.

Possible

Polymer coating degradation and shedding

Fabric-applied polymer coatings can degrade with washing, wear, and UV exposure, potentially releasing microparticles back into the environment or onto skin. No durability or shedding data is publicly available for this proprietary formulation.

Possible

Skin sensitization or irritation from residues

Fabric protectors that are not fully cured or completely removed by pre-washing can remain on textile fibers and contact skin. Without full ingredient disclosure, specific sensitizers or irritants cannot be ruled out; formaldehyde releasers and silicone allergens are sometimes present in similar products.

Reported

Undisclosed PFAS or fluorinated compounds

The brand's silence on fluorine-free or PFAS-free status, combined with the product's water and stain repellent function, suggests traditional fluorocarbon chemistry may be in use. Third-party testing or manufacturer confirmation is necessary to establish actual PFAS absence.

Likely

Inadequate safety labeling or consumer warnings

Proprietary formulations often come with minimal hazard labeling on consumer-facing packaging. The lack of ingredient transparency and brand disclosure makes it difficult for users to assess personal or household risk, particularly for vulnerable groups.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Fabric Treatment Sprays

Murphy Oil Soap Wood Cleaner Spray Orange 22 oz.

Murphy Oil Soap

Wood Cleaner Spray Orange 22 oz.

Mineral oil, soap, water, fragrance, spray formula

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Traditional cleaner with no water-repellent coating or coating triggers.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Murphy Oil Soap Multi-Use Spray

Murphy Oil Soap

Multi-Use Spray

mineral oil, surfactants, water

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower PFAS concern; formulated cleaner without typical PFAS triggers.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Murphy Oil Spray (22 oz., 01181)

Murphy Oil Soap

Murphy Oil Spray (22 oz., 01181)

mineral oil soap solution, spray formulation

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern oil soap product with no known PFAS use.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fabric treatment sprays grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.