40/ 100
F
OverallF28/100
200 Series Waterproof Wireless Charger

Smartdevil · Waterproof Phone Chargers & Cables

200 Series Waterproof Wireless Charger

F · High PFAS

Insufficient transparency on waterproof coating composition; skip unless confirmed PFAS-free.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof coating composition undisclosed; PFAS risk unconfirmed. Non-PFAS hazards low for sealed wireless charger if kept dry and within spec.

Smartdevil's 200 Series uses waterproof treatment but does not disclose coating materials or PFAS status. Wireless chargers typically use polyurethane or Teflon-family coating water barriers, many containing PFAS. No third-party verification available.

The safe swap

CASETiFY PowerThru 2-in-1 Charging Stand

Casetify

CASETiFY PowerThru 2-in-1 Charging Stand

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

unspecified polymer with waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Smartdevil 200 Series uses an unspecified polymer housing with an unnamed waterproof coating. Wireless chargers are sealed electronics with minimal user contact, so material leaching into food or skin is not a primary concern. However, the waterproof coating formulation is the critical unknown: manufacturers typically use either silicone-based sealants, polyurethane, or Teflon-family coating coatings, each with different thermal and degradation profiles. Without disclosure, you cannot verify whether the coating contains PFAS, which is the main chemical concern for this product type.

The brand's record and disclosure

Smartdevil has maintained silence on waterproof coating composition and PFAS use, which is common among budget consumer-electronics brands but signals low material transparency. No public recalls, certifications (such as UL, FCC environmental claims), or third-party safety testing records are readily available for this model. The brand does not appear to have published any material safety data sheets or environmental declarations. This lack of proactive disclosure means you are making a trust-based purchase rather than an informed one.

How it compares in its category

Wireless chargers in this price range typically use similar polymer housings with silicone or polyurethane waterproofing; Teflon-family coating (Teflon-type coating/PFOA-containing) coatings are less common in budget devices but do appear in premium or marine-grade models. Most brands in this segment do not disclose waterproof coating chemistry, making the Smartdevil 200 typical rather than exceptional in opacity. Higher-end alternatives often carry IP certifications or explicit PFAS-free statements, though these cost more. The lack of differentiation here reflects industry-wide transparency gaps in consumer electronics.

If you buy it

Keep the device away from heat sources above 50°C (122°F) and do not submerge it beyond the stated waterproof rating. Avoid prolonged exposure to direct sunlight, which can degrade unknown polymers and coatings over time. If the waterproof seal cracks or the housing shows visible wear, discontinue use to prevent internal corrosion and potential short circuits. Store in a dry location and inspect the seals annually; replacement is recommended if the product is used in high-moisture environments for more than 2-3 years.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Waterproof coating degradation and leachables

Unknown polymer coating may degrade under thermal stress, humidity, or UV exposure, potentially releasing uncharacterized organic compounds. Risk is low if the device remains sealed and unexposed to heat, but increases with age and environmental stress.

Possible

Internal corrosion and secondary hazards if seal fails

Breached waterproof seal can allow water ingress into electronic components, leading to corrosion, short circuits, or failure. This is a product-longevity issue rather than a direct chemical hazard, but failed units should not be used.

Possible

PFAS in waterproof coating (unconfirmed)

Waterproof coatings in consumer electronics sometimes contain legacy PFOA or modern PFAS alternatives (GenX, PFBS) for water repellency. Smartdevil's silence on this means the risk cannot be ruled out, though sealed wireless chargers pose minimal skin or ingestion exposure if intact.

None known

Thermal instability of unspecified polymer

No reported thermal failure or off-gassing issues in publicly available data for this model. Wireless chargers generate modest heat (typically under 60°C at the coil), and the housing is designed to dissipate it; risk is low if used within manufacturer specifications.

None known

Heavy metals in electronic components (housing exterior only)

The polymer housing itself is not a typical source of lead or cadmium unless it contains colored pigments or recycled plastic. No testing or complaints on record for this model suggest standard-grade materials.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Phone Chargers & Cables

CASETiFY PowerThru 2-in-1 Charging Stand

Casetify

PowerThru 2-in-1 Charging Stand

Plastic/aluminum charging stand, typical electronics materials

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

No PFAS risk signals identified.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Chiikawa D2 x CASETiFY PowerThru Magnetic Wireless Charger

Casetify

Chiikawa D2 x CASETiFY PowerThru Magnetic Wireless Charger

Wireless charger, metal and plastic components

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Electronics charger with no known PFAS risk signals identified.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Miffy PowerThru 2-in-1 Charging Stand

Casetify

Miffy PowerThru 2-in-1 Charging Stand

Plastic, metal, likely silicone or TPE

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Likely lower concern; no disclosed PFAS use in typical charging stands.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof phone chargers & cables grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.