70/ 100
C
OverallF52/100
Sistema To Go Small Split Container

Sistema · Food Storage Containers

Sistema To Go Small Split Container

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern, standard rigid plastic food container with no known fluorochemical treatment.

Verdict: BuyPolypropylene food container with no established hazard record; lower PFAS concern; standard food-safe plastic with proper use.

Sistema's To Go Small Split Container is a polypropylene lunch box designed for food storage. PP is a base plastic with no inherent PFAS risk, and Sistema makes no claims or disclosures about PFAS or fluorochemical treatments on this product.

Shop Sistema on Amazon →

Material

Polypropylene (PP) plastic with silicone gaskets

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This container is injection-molded polypropylene (PP, #5 plastic), a rigid thermoplastic chosen for food storage because it is non-toxic at normal use temperatures and has no known migration of harmful chemicals into food at room temperature. The silicone gaskets provide an airtight seal and are chemically inert; silicone does not leach plasticizers or bisphenols. Polypropylene itself contains no BPA, BPS, or phthalates by formulation, and rigid PP is generally stable and resistant to degradation during normal food storage.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sistema is a New Zealand-based food-storage brand with a long history in the category and no published recalls or safety controversies in the public record regarding chemical hazards. The company does not publicly disclose manufacturing certifications (e.g., third-party toxicology testing) or detailed material sourcing statements, which is typical of mid-market consumer plastics brands. No independent testing or regulatory actions against Sistema containers for leaching, off-gassing, or contaminant migration have been reported.

How it compares in its category

Rigid polypropylene food containers are industry standard and are considered lower-hazard than flexible plastics or older polycarbonate alternatives. Sistema containers occupy the mid-to-budget segment; they perform similarly to competitors like Rubbermaid Brilliance (also PP) and Pyrex glass alternatives in terms of chemical stability, though glass and stainless steel avoid plastic-leaching concerns entirely. The silicone gasket is a premium feature that reduces air exposure and minimizes the need for repeated opening, which can extend seal integrity.

If you buy it

Do not microwave this container; polypropylene softens above 160°C and may degrade, especially around seals. Hand wash the silicone gasket separately and allow it to air dry to prevent mold or odor accumulation. Store at room temperature away from direct sunlight to slow polymer aging. Replace the container if the gasket cracks, seals no longer lock, or if the plastic becomes cloudy, warped, or develops permanent discoloration, as these signs indicate material degradation. Avoid prolonged contact with hot foods or liquids above 70°C.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

BPA / BPS migration

Polypropylene formulations do not contain BPA or BPS by design. No reports of either chemical in Sistema PP containers.

None known

Phthalate leaching

PP rigid plastic does not use phthalate plasticizers; this hazard is not applicable to this product category or material.

Possible

Polymer degradation and microplastic shedding

Prolonged exposure to heat, sunlight, or mechanical stress (heavy use, washing) can cause PP to become brittle and shed particles. Risk is low during normal cold-food storage but increases with misuse or aging.

Possible

Silicone gasket contamination or mold

If the gasket is not dried thoroughly after washing, it can trap moisture and harbor mold or bacterial growth. Regular inspection and replacement of gaskets every 1-2 years of heavy use is prudent.

Reported

Odor and stain absorption

Polypropylene is porous and absorbs oils and pigments from foods (e.g., curry, tomato, turmeric). This is cosmetic and does not indicate chemical leaching, but degraded discolored containers should be replaced for hygiene confidence.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers

Caraway Food Storage Set

Caraway

Food Storage Set

Glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; glass + plastic lids with stated PFAS-free position, but no third-party verification of lid material.

Risky category by default

Caraway Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Caraway

Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern option; glass containers avoid PFAS coatings, but verify lid material before purchase.

Risky category by default

Caraway Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

Caraway

Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

borosilicate glass with non-PFAS lid

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Lower PFAS concern, glass container with stated non-PFAS lid, though third-party verification absent.

Risky category by default

More food storage containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.