75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Hinoki & Sage Natural Deodorant

Sense of Scents · Deodorant

Hinoki & Sage Natural Deodorant

C · Moderate

Lower concern, natural deodorant formula unlikely to require PFAS, but verify ingredients list for sourcing transparency.

Verdict: BuyNatural deodorant formula with no established safety concerns; brand transparency is limited but product category carries minimal chemical risk.

Natural deodorants rarely require PFAS-based coatings or water/stain repellents that drive contamination in cosmetics. However, Sense of Scents makes no public PFAS disclosure.

Shop Sense of Scents on Amazon →

Material

Natural deodorant base (presumed mineral, plant oil, or powder)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Natural deodorants typically combine mineral bases (baking soda, arrowroot powder, or magnesium), plant oils (coconut or jojoba), and botanical extracts for fragrance and antimicrobial benefit. Hinoki and sage are plant-derived ingredients with no known dermal toxicity at cosmetic concentrations. The absence of synthetic antiperspirants, silicones, and talc in this category means reduced risk of skin irritation or inhalation hazards compared to conventional stick deodorants.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sense of Scents operates as a small natural personal care brand; no recalls, safety violations, or substantiated complaints appear in public records. The brand does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, COSMOS Organic) on readily available materials. Limited transparency on manufacturing standards and supplier vetting makes independent assessment of heavy metal contamination in mineral bases difficult.

How it compares in its category

This product positions itself in the growing natural deodorant segment, which typically avoids aluminum chlorohydrate (the active antiperspirant in conventional products) and talc. Natural formulations carry lower acute toxicity risk than mainstream antiperspirants but may offer reduced efficacy and vary more in stability. Performance and irritation profiles depend heavily on individual skin pH and sensitivity; natural deodorants are not antimicrobial-efficacy regulated by the FDA like antiperspirants.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry location to prevent oil separation or powder caking, especially if in a cream or balm base. Patch test on inner arm for 24 hours before full application, as baking soda or plant oils can irritate sensitive skin. Discontinue use if rash, burning, or persistent redness develops within one week of first use. Replace if the product shows signs of mold, rancidity (off smell), or color change, which indicates spoilage.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) skin irritation

A common ingredient in natural deodorants, baking soda can cause irritation, redness, or dermatitis in sensitive individuals or with prolonged contact, especially on broken skin. Not a hazard for most users but warrants a patch test before regular use.

None known

Heavy metal contamination in mineral powders

No specific recalls or testing data for Sense of Scents products exist on record. Mineral-based deodorants (e.g., arrowroot, magnesium) can harbor trace heavy metals (lead, cadmium) depending on sourcing; brand does not publicly disclose third-party testing for contaminants in raw materials.

Possible

Fragrance allergens (hinoki, sage extracts)

Botanical fragrances, including cedar-derived hinoki and sage, are known contact allergens in a small subset of the population. No broad toxicity concern, but individuals with fragrance sensitivity or botanical allergies should avoid or patch test first.

Possible

Rancidity in plant oil base

If the product contains coconut or other plant oils as a base, oxidation and microbial growth are possible if stored improperly or past shelf life, leading to irritation or mild dermatitis. Shelf life and storage conditions are not detailed on most available product pages.

None known

Talc contamination risk (if talc-based alternative)

No evidence that Sense of Scents uses talc in this formula; natural deodorant marketing typically emphasizes talc-free status. However, if talc is present as a secondary ingredient, long-term inhalation risk applies; confirm ingredient list excludes talc if concerned.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Antiperspirant Deodorant

mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.

MADE SAFE CertifiedLeaping Bunny (cruelty-free)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.