Sense of Scents · Deodorant
After Glow (Raspberry & Mandarin) Mini Deodorant
Lower concern, but brand transparency on formulation is absent.
This is a conventional stick deodorant with no known PFAS-prone ingredients (no waterproofing or nonstick coating required). However, Sense of Scents makes no public disclosure about PFAS-free status or ingredient sourcing, making it impossible to rule out PFAS contaminants in fragrance or preservatives.
Shop Sense of Scents on Amazon →Material
standard cosmetic emulsion (deodorant base)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
After Glow is a cosmetic emulsion deodorant, typically composed of water, starch or talc-derived absorbents, oils, waxes, and fragrance compounds. The 'Raspberry & Mandarin' scent profile relies on synthetic fragrance molecules and natural citrus extracts. Emulsion-type deodorants are generally stable at room temperature and do not pose thermal degradation risks like antiperspirants under aluminum stress, but fragrance components can trigger sensitivities in sensitive skin or mucous membranes.
The brand's record and disclosure
Sense of Scents is a smaller indie cosmetics brand with no established public record of third-party safety certifications (e.g., ECOCERT, Clean Beauty, Leaping Bunny) or formal allergen labeling beyond standard cosmetic ingredient lists. The brand maintains silence on PFAS mitigation strategies and does not publicly disclose fragrance component sourcing or talc-free status, which are standard transparency measures in the contemporary deodorant market. No major recalls or safety controversies are documented for this product on public health databases.
How it compares in its category
Mainstream deodorant brands (e.g., Schmidt's, Native, Crystal) routinely declare talc-free formulations and fragrance allergen sourcing; Sense of Scents does not. Indie brands in this tier typically match or exceed price without equivalent disclosure infrastructure. PFAS scores of 75/100 place this product in the middle-upper range for the category; many certified organic or hypoallergenic alternatives score 80+, while mass-market aerosol deodorants often score lower due to propellant and plasticizer residues.
If you buy it
Apply sparingly to dry skin to avoid greasiness and migration onto clothing. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight, as citrus fragrance components can degrade or oxidize in heat. If skin irritation, rash, or persistent itching develops within 48 hours of first use, discontinue and rinse thoroughly; this suggests fragrance sensitivity. Replace every 6-12 months or when fragrance quality noticeably diminishes, as emulsion deodorants separate over time and lose efficacy.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens and skin sensitization
Raspberry and mandarin fragrance compounds include natural and synthetic molecules (e.g., citral, linalool) that are known contact allergens in a small percentage of users. No ingredient-by-ingredient fragrance breakdown is publicly available from the brand, preventing pre-purchase allergy screening.
Talc contamination or undisclosed talc content
Mineral-based absorbents in emulsion deodorants may contain trace talc or talc-adjacent minerals. The brand does not explicitly certify talc-free status. If talc is present, repeated underarm application poses low but documented aspiration and skin irritation risk over years of use.
Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives
Standard cosmetic preservatives (e.g., methylisothiazolinone, parabens) used in emulsion deodorants do not typically release formaldehyde in this product class. No specific formulation record for After Glow is public, so this cannot be ruled out entirely, but emulsions are lower-risk than powder or spray formats.
Heavy metal pigment residue in colorants
If the product contains visual colorants (e.g., for the 'glow' effect), these are typically synthetic organic dyes rather than mineral pigments. No record of heavy metal contamination in indie deodorants at this price point; regulatory compliance with cosmetic lead limits is standard in most markets.
Microbial contamination from emulsion instability
Oil-water emulsions require effective preservative systems; if the brand uses minimal or natural preservatives without verification, jar or tube storage over months increases risk of mold or bacterial colonization, especially in humid climates. No manufacturing date or shelf-life guidance is typically printed on indie cosmetics.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 62% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.