Schmidt's · Deodorant
Schmidt Old Tyme Natural Deodorant Cedarwood + Juniper
Lower concern, natural deodorant with no water-repellency or stain-resistance triggers typical of PFAS use.
Schmidt's Old Tyme Natural Deodorant is a solid stick formulation using mineral and plant-based ingredients with no disclosed waterproofing, stain resistance, or nonstick coatings that would require PFAS.
Shop Schmidt's on Amazon →Material
mineral, plant-based wax, essential oils (no reported waterproof/grease-resistant coating)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Schmidt's Old Tyme uses mineral salts (likely potassium alum or similar), plant-derived waxes, and essential oils (cedarwood, juniper) as the active and binding matrix. This formulation avoids synthetic polymers, silicones, and talc that carry contamination or inhalation risks. The mineral-salt base is non-toxic and has been used in deodorants for decades; essential oils provide fragrance without synthetic fragrance chemicals that may contain undisclosed allergens or 1,4-dioxane precursors. No waterproofing coatings or grease-resistant additives are present, eliminating the primary PFAS triggers in personal care.
The brand's record and disclosure
Schmidt's markets itself as a clean, natural brand and holds Natural Products Association and Leaping Bunny certifications, indicating third-party review for ingredient safety and cruelty-free standards. The company publishes ingredient lists transparently on packaging and website. No recalls, formal safety complaints, or third-party testing failures are on public record for this product line. Brand does not volunteer PFAS testing data, which is typical for natural deodorants without water-repellent claims, but absence of such claims makes accidental PFAS contamination unlikely.
How it compares in its category
Natural mineral and plant-wax deodorants like Schmidt's carry lower chemical risk profiles than antiperspirants (which contain aluminum chlorohydrate) or spray/aerosol formulas (inhalation hazard). Compared to conventional stick deodorants with synthetic fragrances, dimethicone, or talc, this product avoids those additives. The trade-off is effectiveness in humid climates or high-sweat activity; consumers seeking clinical-strength function should expect limitations inherent to the category, not a safety issue.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat to prevent wax separation or mineral salt clumping. The product should not be applied to broken or irritated skin; if redness or itching occurs after a few days, rinse off and discontinue (possible sensitivity to cedarwood or juniper oil in some individuals). Replace when product visibly degrades, crumbles, or stops adhering to the stick (typically 6-12 months depending on frequency). No special maintenance required; this is a low-maintenance category with straightforward use.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens (cedarwood and juniper essential oils)
Essential oils are natural but can trigger contact dermatitis or allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. Cedarwood and juniper are common allergens; patch testing is recommended for those with sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivities.
Mineral salt (alum) skin irritation
Potassium alum is generally recognized as safe but can cause mild irritation, stinging, or dryness in some users, especially if applied to freshly shaved or broken skin. Not a systemic toxin, but localized irritation is the main reported complaint in user reviews.
Talc contamination
This product does not list talc in its formulation and uses wax and minerals instead. No talc-related risks are identified for this specific product.
Heavy metals in mineral pigments
Mineral salts and plant waxes do not typically carry heavy-metal contaminants at levels of concern in topical deodorants. No testing failures or recalls related to lead, cadmium, or arsenic are on record for Schmidt's products.
Formaldehyde releasers or preservative toxins
The simple mineral and essential-oil base does not require aggressive synthetic preservatives like imidazolidinyl urea or DMDM hydantoin. Natural products may use plant extracts or minimal synthetic preservatives, but no formaldehyde-releasing agents are listed or suspected in this formulation.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.