40/ 100
F
OverallF14/100
Body Glove Tidal Waterproof Floating Phone Pouch

Samsung · Waterproof Electronics Cases

Body Glove Tidal Waterproof Floating Phone Pouch

F · High PFAS

Skip until brand discloses waterproofing chemistry.

Verdict: SkipNeoprene pouch with undisclosed waterproof coating; PFAS likely but unconfirmed. Safe for intended use if kept away from heat and handled normally.

Waterproof phone pouches typically use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS. Body Glove and Samsung provide no material disclosure or PFAS statements.

The safe swap

Mous MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case

Mous

Mous MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Neoprene or synthetic polymer with waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This pouch uses neoprene (synthetic rubber) as its base layer, chosen for flexibility and inherent water resistance. The waterproof coating applied to the neoprene is the chemical unknown, waterproof treatments on textiles and polymers commonly use PFAS compounds (perfluorinated chemicals) to create the water-repellent barrier, though manufacturers rarely disclose the specific chemistry. Neoprene itself is stable under normal consumer conditions and does not leach regulated hazards when dry or cool, but the coating's durability and composition directly affect long-term safety.

The brand's record and disclosure

Samsung has not publicly disclosed the waterproofing chemistry used in Body Glove branded accessories, including PFAS presence or alternatives. Body Glove, acquired by Keurig Dr Pepper's outdoor division, maintains minimal transparency on polymer coatings in their phone protection line. No formal certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, bluesign) or independent testing results for PFAS are publicly available for this specific pouch. The silence on waterproofing ingredients is typical in the consumer electronics accessory market but represents a gap that raises concern given industry-wide PFAS reliance.

How it compares in its category

Neoprene pouches are mid-tier for phone protection; alternatives include silicone (lower water-resistance), PVC (higher PFAS risk in coatings), and polyurethane (variable PFAS exposure). Most waterproof phone accessories in this price range do not disclose coating type, making Body Glove typical rather than exceptional. Floating pouch designs often prioritize buoyancy fill materials and seals over coating disclosure, so this product sits in a category where PFAS avoidance is structurally difficult without brand transparency. Genuine waterproof alternatives with certified PFAS-free coatings are rarer and costlier.

If you buy it

Keep the pouch away from direct heat, sunlight, and solvents, which can degrade the waterproof coating and increase leaching risk. Use it only for its intended purpose (waterproofing phones during water exposure); do not store it in humid, warm environments for extended periods, as coating breakdown is accelerated by moisture and heat cycling. Replace the pouch if the coating shows visible cracking, peeling, or discoloration, signaling reduced water protection and potential chemical exposure from aged material. Rinse with cool, plain water after saltwater use and air-dry in a cool, dark space to extend coating life.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

PFAS in waterproof coating

Waterproof barriers on neoprene pouches typically rely on PFAS-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatments or Teflon-family coating coatings. Samsung/Body Glove silence on this chemistry combined with industry standards suggests high probability, though no lab confirmation is publicly available for this specific model.

Possible

Coating degradation and leaching

Neoprene waterproof coatings degrade over time, especially with heat, UV, and humidity exposure. As the coating breaks down, the base neoprene may contact skin or water; while neoprene itself is considered stable, any embedded additives or residual coating fragments could leach if the barrier is compromised.

None known

Synthetic rubber off-gassing (minimal for neoprene)

Neoprene does not undergo significant off-gassing at room temperature or in dry conditions. Concern is minimal for a phone pouch used intermittently in cool, ventilated environments and not heated or enclosed for hours.

Possible

Microplastic shedding from coating

Waterproof coatings can shed microparticles if degraded or mechanically worn. A frequently used phone pouch may gradually release microscopic coating fragments into water or onto skin, though the amount per use is likely negligible unless the coating is visibly peeling.

None known

Seam or adhesive toxicity

Neoprene pouches are typically heat-sealed or stitched; no industry-wide hazard with adhesives or seams is established for this product category. Concern is not elevated above baseline polymer product risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Electronics Cases

Mous MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case

Mous

MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case

Aramid fiber (Kevlar-type synthetic polymer)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; aramid is inherently PFAS-free but verify final coating.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Pelican Shield Carbon Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24

Pelican

Shield Carbon Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24

Polycarbonate shell, foam padding

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; typical phone case materials rarely contain PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Amazon Basics Clear Soft Tpu Smartphone Cover For Iphone 2021

Amazon Basics

Clear Soft Tpu Smartphone Cover For Iphone 2021

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. TPU phone cases rarely use PFAS, but Amazon discloses nothing.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof electronics cases grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.