Case-Mate · Waterproof Electronics Cases
Case-Mate Waterproof Floating Pouch 2-Pack
Waterproof pouch with unknown coating; PFAS concern unclear.
Case-Mate does not disclose PFAS or coating details for this floating pouch. Waterproof treatments often use fluorinated compounds. Contact the brand for material specifics before purchase.
The safe swap
Mous
Mous MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case
85/100 safety
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Polyurethane or unspecified waterproof coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Case-Mate waterproof pouches are constructed from polyurethane or a polyurethane-based laminate with an unspecified waterproof surface treatment. Polyurethane itself is stable and inert under normal use, but the waterproofing additive is not disclosed. Many waterproof coatings historically relied on PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals") to repel water and oil, though alternatives now exist. Without transparent labeling, the presence and identity of the waterproofing agent cannot be confirmed from public sources.
The brand's record and disclosure
Case-Mate has not made public commitments to PFAS phase-out or material transparency for this product line. The company does not provide detailed material safety data sheets or coating composition for consumer pouches. No formal recalls or safety controversies specific to this pouch model are documented in public databases. The brand's silence on waterproofing chemistry is typical for consumer accessories but limits independent verification of chemical hazards.
How it compares in its category
Waterproof pouches span a wide spectrum of coating technologies. Case-Mate occupies the mid-market segment where PFAS-free alternatives are increasingly available from competitors, though not uniformly disclosed. Silicone-coated or wax-based pouches offer comparable waterproofing with lower chemical concern, though durability varies. This pouch's price and brand recognition suggest it competes on convenience rather than chemical transparency.
If you buy it
Avoid prolonged contact with skin, especially for young children or sensitive individuals, as waterproof coatings can occasionally trigger contact irritation. Do not expose the pouch to heat above 50 degrees Celsius (122 degrees Fahrenheit), as polyurethane can degrade and off-gas volatile compounds at elevated temperatures. Inspect the coating regularly for cracks, peeling, or discoloration; discard if the waterproof layer deteriorates significantly. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to minimize coating breakdown over time.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Unidentified waterproofing coating chemistry
The specific waterproofing agent is not disclosed by Case-Mate. If PFAS-based, long-term skin contact or ingestion of shed particles poses bioaccumulation risk; if non-PFAS, acute toxicity risk is low but unknown additives cannot be ruled out without transparency.
Polyurethane thermal degradation
Polyurethane substrates release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and isocyanate residues when heated. This poses minimal risk in normal ambient use but significant concern if pouch is exposed to heat, direct sunlight in vehicles, or near hot electronics.
Coating adhesion and microparticle shedding
Waterproof coatings on flexible pouches are subject to flexing stress and can flake or shed fine particles over time, especially if scratched or worn. Ingestion of coating fragments by children or ingestion in stored food items is a plausible if not common scenario.
Contact sensitization from residual monomers
Polyurethane products occasionally retain unreacted isocyanate or polyol monomers, which can trigger skin irritation in sensitive individuals. No specific reports exist for Case-Mate pouches, but risk is inherent to polyurethane manufacturing and cannot be ruled out without material testing.
Off-gassing in enclosed spaces
If the pouch is sealed tightly with electronics or food in warm conditions, volatile residues from polyurethane or coating additives may accumulate. Risk is low for short-term use but relevant for extended storage in hot environments.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 42% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Electronics Cases
Mous
MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case
Aramid fiber (Kevlar-type synthetic polymer)
Lower concern; aramid is inherently PFAS-free but verify final coating.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Pelican
Shield Carbon Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24
Polycarbonate shell, foam padding
Lower concern; typical phone case materials rarely contain PFAS.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Amazon Basics
Clear Soft Tpu Smartphone Cover For Iphone 2021
Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Lower concern. TPU phone cases rarely use PFAS, but Amazon discloses nothing.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More waterproof electronics cases grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.