Samsung · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection
67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera
Unknown optical coatings pose unquantified PFAS risk. Skip until clarity.
Clip-on camera filter composition unclear; optical coatings often contain Teflon-family coating. No brand PFAS disclosure available. Consider alternatives with transparent material sourcing.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Glass lens, metal frame, unspecified optical coatings
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Unknown / proprietary coating
Proprietary coating with no disclosed chemistry.
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This clip-on CPL (circular polarizing) filter consists of optical glass mounted in a metal frame (likely aluminum or brass). The critical unknown is the optical coating applied to the glass surfaces, anti-reflective and polarizing coatings often contain fluorinated compounds or other proprietary formulations that manufacturers rarely disclose. Glass itself is inert, but coatings are where chemical risk concentrates in optical products.
The brand's record and disclosure
Samsung has not publicly disclosed manufacturing details, material sourcing, or coating chemistry for this accessory line. The company's broader consumer electronics division has faced scrutiny over supply chain transparency but has not issued specific statements on optical filter safety. No independent certifications (RoHS, reach compliance statements) are documented for this specific product model.
How it compares in its category
Clip-on camera filters occupy a narrow, lightly regulated niche, optical coatings are rarely subject to the same disclosure requirements as food contact or textile products. Most competing brands (Neewer, K&F Concept, Hoya) similarly do not publicly specify coating composition. This product's risk profile is representative of the category, meaning the problem is structural opacity, not Samsung-specific failure.
If you buy it
Store the filter in a dry case to prevent moisture ingress into coating layers, which can degrade optical performance and potentially release coating materials. Clean only with microfiber cloths; avoid solvents or prolonged contact with skin oils. Do not expose to prolonged heat or direct sunlight storage, as thermal stress may compromise coating adhesion. Inspect annually for hazing, scratches, or discoloration, these signal coating degradation and warrant replacement.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Unspecified optical coating composition
Anti-reflective and polarizing coatings on glass lenses commonly use fluorinated or silicone-based formulations, but Samsung does not disclose specifics for this filter. Risk is primarily inhalation during manufacturing or potential leaching if coating degrades; consumer exposure during normal use is low unless filter is ingested or heavily worn.
Coating degradation and particulate release
Over years of use, optical coatings can flake or separate from substrate glass, especially if exposed to moisture, heat, or mechanical stress. Degraded coatings may release fine particles; inhalation risk is minimal in normal phone camera use but present if filter is disassembled or abraded.
Metal frame leaching (aluminum or brass)
If the frame is bare aluminum, prolonged contact with skin oils or moisture can promote surface corrosion and trace metal release. Brass frames may contain lead (though unlikely in regulated markets). Contact is typically minimal and indirect in this application, but prolonged skin contact should be avoided.
Glass integrity and cutting risk
Dropped or damaged filters may shatter, creating sharp glass fragments. This is a mechanical hazard rather than chemical, but relevant for safe handling and storage, particularly in homes with children.
Bacterial growth in clip mechanism
No documented cases, but the clip housing may trap moisture and dust if not cleaned regularly. Risk is negligible for this specific product design.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection
B+W
67mm UV Haze Filter
Glass optic with multi-coated lens surfaces
Lower concern. Optical glass and standard coatings unlikely to contain PFAS.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Lower concern. Optical glass filters rarely use PFAS.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
B+W
Basic Clear Filter MRC
Optical glass, multi-coated
Lower PFAS concern. Optical glass filters rarely use PFAS-based coatings.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More waterproof camera & lens protection grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.