90/ 100
A
OverallD68/100
Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet

Sage · Toaster Ovens

Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet

A · Very low PFAS

Lower-concern option; ceramic coating claims PFOA/Teflon-type coating-free, but third-party verification absent.

Verdict: BuyCeramic non-stick coating avoids Teflon-type coating/PFOA; no lead/cadmium recalls on record. Verify heat limits and inspect coating annually.

Caraway's ceramic baking sheets are marketed as PFOA and Teflon-type coating-free, positioning ceramic as the non-stick alternative to traditional Teflon-family coating. The brand publicly claims avoidance of legacy PFAS but provides no independent lab testing or third-party certification to verify the coating's full PFAS profile.

Brand says: “Made with a ceramic non-stick surface and marketed as PFOA and PTFE-free

Shop Sage on Amazon →

Material

Ceramic non-stick coating (proprietary formulation)

Brand disclosure

Brand claims PFAS-free

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

Brand-stated PFAS-free

The brand states the product is PFAS-free (self-declared).

Helps the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Caraway's ceramic baking sheet uses a proprietary ceramic non-stick coating applied over steel or aluminum substrate. Ceramic coatings are inorganic mineral layers that do not contain Teflon-type coating (Teflon) or PFOA, making them chemically distinct from traditional non-stick cookware. The trade-off is that ceramic non-stick surfaces are less durable and more prone to chipping or peeling over time with repeated use and thermal stress. No public data confirms the exact binder chemistry, so unknown leachables from aged or damaged coatings cannot be ruled out.

The brand's record and disclosure

Caraway (parent: Sage Collective) has marketed itself as a PFAS-free brand and published PFAS commitments across its cookware line. The company has not published independent third-party test reports (e.g., NSF, ISO) confirming absence of PFOA/Teflon-type coating in this specific product. No major recalls or health complaints linked to this baking sheet have been documented in FDA or CPSC databases. Transparency on coating durability and replacement guidance is limited in public materials.

How it compares in its category

Ceramic non-stick baking sheets occupy a middle ground: safer than traditional Teflon-type coating-coated pans in terms of PFAS exposure, but more fragile than uncoated steel or cast iron. Most competing ceramic bakeware (Le Creuset, GreenPan, Our Place) also lack independent coating verification. Uncoated carbon steel or ceramic stoneware remain the only alternatives with zero coating degradation risk, though they require seasoning or oil. Caraway's design and brand reputation place it above budget ceramic options with minimal safety history.

If you buy it

Keep the baking sheet below the manufacturer's stated maximum temperature (typically 400-500F for ceramic non-stick); exceeding this accelerates coating breakdown. Hand wash or use low-heat machine cycles to preserve the coating; abrasive scrubbers, scouring pads, and metal utensils will chip it. Inspect the surface monthly for cracks, peeling, or discoloration; replace the sheet if coating damage is visible. Store flat to avoid warping and stacking damage.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Ceramic coating degradation and leaching

Ceramic coatings can flake or degrade with thermal cycling and acidic foods. No specific leachate analysis for this product is publicly available; aged or damaged coatings may release trace minerals or binder compounds of unknown composition.

None known

Lead or cadmium in ceramic glaze

No recalls or regulatory findings of lead/cadmium contamination in Caraway ceramic cookware have been published. US cookware is subject to FDA limits on lead/cadmium migration, but Caraway does not disclose independent testing results.

Possible

Aluminum substrate corrosion (if aluminum base)

If the substrate is aluminum rather than steel, corrosion of the aluminum base may occur if the ceramic coating is damaged or if acidic foods contact exposed edges. Caraway has not publicly confirmed substrate material or corrosion protection.

Reported

Thermal stress and warping

User reviews and discussions indicate some instances of warping or coating separation with repeated high-heat use or thermal shock (e.g., moving from oven to cool surface). This is a durability rather than acute safety issue but affects product lifespan.

Possible

Unknown binder or additive compounds in proprietary coating

Caraway markets its coating as proprietary and does not disclose the full chemical formulation, binders, or crosslinkers. Long-term safety of unlisted additives cannot be assessed without independent ingredient disclosure or third-party testing.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More toaster ovens grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.