70/ 100
C
OverallF58/100
Menstrual Cup

Ruby Cup · Menstrual Cups

Menstrual Cup

C · Moderate

Lower concern; silicone cups lack typical PFAS sources, but brand does not disclose testing.

Verdict: BuyMedical-grade silicone menstrual cups carry minimal established hazards; Ruby Cup lacks PFAS disclosure but silicone formulation itself presents lower PFAS risk than alternatives.

Ruby Cup menstrual cups are made from medical-grade silicone, a material not typically associated with PFAS use. The product itself has no nonstick, waterproof, or stain-resistant coatings that would warrant PFAS.

Shop Ruby Cup on Amazon →

Material

Medical-grade silicone

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Ruby Cup is manufactured from medical-grade silicone, a synthetic rubber polymer that does not naturally contain the PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) found in some coatings and water-repellent treatments. Medical-grade silicone is thermally stable and chemically inert in contact with vaginal tissues over typical use temperatures (body temperature and cool storage). Unlike some menstrual products, silicone cups do not rely on dyes, fragrance coatings, or adhesive binders that commonly introduce regulated additives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Ruby Cup provides no published transparency report on PFAS testing, heavy metal screening, or third-party certification of silicone purity. The brand does not list FDA clearance, ISO 13485 (medical device standard), or independent lab reports on its website. This silence on material testing is typical of the menstrual cup industry but represents a missed opportunity for consumer confidence. No recalls or safety controversies have been publicly documented for this brand.

How it compares in its category

Menstrual cups as a category carry lower chemical contamination risk than tampons, pads, or disposable applicators because they involve no bleaching, fragrance, adhesives, or wood pulp. Most medical-grade silicone cups (Diva Cup, Lena, Saalt, etc.) have similar material profiles. Ruby Cup differs mainly in brand reputation and user support rather than material safety. Latex cups pose higher allergy risk; cheaper silicone alternatives lack assurance of medical-grade formulation, making purity uncertain.

If you buy it

Boil the cup in water for 5-10 minutes before first use and monthly thereafter to sterilize. Store in a breathable cloth pouch (not sealed plastic) to prevent mold. Replace every 5-10 years or if silicone becomes sticky, discolored, or develops tears. Avoid prolonged exposure to direct sunlight or high heat (above 60°C / 140°F) during storage. Do not use silicone-degrading oils or solvents; wash only with mild soap and water.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Silicone degradation and leaching

Medical-grade silicone is formulated to resist breakdown under body temperature and vaginal pH. No established research documents leaching of silicone oligomers from menstrual cups at clinically relevant levels, though manufacturer purity testing is not publicly disclosed for Ruby Cup.

Possible

Allergenicity and sensitization

Silicone itself is hypoallergenic for most users, but trace dyes, release agents, or vulcanization by-products could theoretically trigger localized sensitivity. Ruby Cup does not disclose additive composition, so individual reactions cannot be ruled out without patch testing reports.

Possible

Bacterial colonization risk

If the cup is not boiled or air-dried properly between uses, vaginal bacteria and fungi can proliferate in biofilm on the silicone surface. This is a maintenance issue rather than a manufacturing defect but is user-dependent and not specific to Ruby Cup.

Possible

Mold and mildew growth in storage

If stored wet in a sealed plastic case, mold can grow on the silicone and introduce fungal contaminants. Ruby Cup is sold with a storage pouch; proper drying before storage is essential to prevent this.

None known

Heavy metals in silicone pigments (if colored)

Ruby Cup is typically clear or translucent silicone; colored menstrual cups may use iron oxides or other colorants. No lab data on Ruby Cup color composition is publicly available, but clear formulations avoid this exposure pathway.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Menstrual Cups

DIVA Cup Model 2

Aisle

DIVA Cup Model 2

Medical-grade silicone (body); no Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower-concern menstrual cup; silicone construction and PFAS-free commitment make it a reasonable choice.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Ruby Cup Steriliser

Ruby Cup

Steriliser

Stainless steel heating chamber with silicone/plastic components

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern menstrual cup sterilizer; stainless core typical for appliances, but silicone/plastic parts unspecified, contact brand for material detail.

Risky category by default

Ruby Cup Steriliser Purple

Ruby Cup

Steriliser Purple

stainless steel steriliser/heating element

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; no high-risk coatings typical of this product category.

Risky category by default

More menstrual cups grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.