70/ 100
C
OverallF54/100
Saalt Menstrual Cup Twin Pack

Saalt · Menstrual Cups

Saalt Menstrual Cup Twin Pack

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; silicone cups are not typical PFAS vectors, but brand discloses nothing.

Verdict: BuyMedical-grade silicone cups pose minimal chemical leaching risk; no reported contamination issues; brand transparency is weak but product material class is well-established as safe.

Saalt menstrual cups are made from medical-grade silicone, a material not typically treated with PFAS coatings. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS information or hold third-party certifications.

Shop Saalt on Amazon →

Material

Medical-grade silicone (primary); no reported coatings

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Saalt cups are constructed from medical-grade silicone, a synthetic polymer chosen specifically for menstrual products because it resists degradation, does not leach estrogenic compounds like BPA, and tolerates repeated heat sterilization. Medical-grade silicone has no reactive surface coatings, glazes, or dyes that typically introduce heavy metals or formaldehyde resins. The material is chemically inert across the pH range and temperature conditions of normal use, making silicone cups fundamentally different from plastic food storage containers or ceramic cookware where leaching is a documented concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Saalt provides minimal third-party certification data or independent safety testing summaries on its website; the brand does not publish detailed material sourcing, manufacturing origin, or chemical testing reports that competitors like Lunette or Diva Cup sometimes highlight. No product recalls, contamination incidents, or safety complaints have been publicly reported for Saalt menstrual cups. The brand's silence on PFAS and heavy metal testing is a disclosure gap, though it does not indicate an actual hazard given the silicone material class.

How it compares in its category

Medical-grade silicone menstrual cups (Saalt, Diva Cup, Lunette, Flex) represent the lowest-risk category within period products; they avoid the microfiber shedding risk of conventional tampons and pads, the absorbent material fragmentation concerns, and the chemical residues from bleach or dioxin found in some disposable products. Saalt's design and material composition are functionally equivalent to other silicone competitors, with differences mainly in firmness, capacity, and stem shape rather than safety profile. Natural rubber latex cups carry allergy risk for sensitive users; this is not a factor with Saalt's silicone formulation.

If you buy it

Sterilize by boiling in water for 5-10 minutes before first use and after each cycle; do not use bleach, which can degrade silicone over years of use. Store in the breathable cotton pouch provided to prevent mold or bacterial growth in sealed plastic bags. Replace the cup every 5-10 years or immediately if you notice discoloration, odor that doesn't wash away, or visible tears or pitting; degradation is rare with proper care but silicone is not immortal. Avoid prolonged exposure to direct sunlight or heat sources above 60°C when not in use, as extreme conditions can eventually compromise elasticity.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Silicone degradation over time

Medical-grade silicone is highly durable but is not permanent; discoloration, loss of elasticity, or surface pitting can occur after 5-10 years of use or with improper storage (exposure to extreme heat, UV, or harsh chemicals). Risk is low under normal use but warrants periodic visual inspection.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth from storage

If stored wet or in sealed non-breathable containers, menstrual cups can harbor bacteria or fungi; this is a maintenance issue, not a material flaw. Saalt includes a cotton pouch designed to avoid this, but user error in storage is a documented concern across the category.

None known

Heavy metals or contaminants in silicone feedstock

No public reports of lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination in Saalt or comparable medical-grade silicone menstrual cups. The material source and supplier chain are not fully transparent, but silicone's chemical structure does not inherently accumulate metals as ceramics or glazed cookware can.

Possible

Allergic reaction to silicone or additives

True silicone allergy is extremely rare, but some individuals report irritation or allergic contact dermatitis; this may be due to residual uncrosslinked oligomers or processing aids rather than the silicone polymer itself. Thorough rinsing and boiling before first use minimizes this risk. No specific allergen incidents reported for Saalt brand.

Possible

Vaginal irritation from improper fit or insertion

This is a biomechanical rather than chemical hazard; cups that are too firm, too large, or inserted incorrectly can cause tissue irritation. Saalt offers multiple sizes and firmness options, but fit is user-dependent and not a material safety issue unique to this brand.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Menstrual Cups

DIVA Cup Model 2

Aisle

DIVA Cup Model 2

Medical-grade silicone (body); no Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower-concern menstrual cup; silicone construction and PFAS-free commitment make it a reasonable choice.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Ruby Cup Steriliser

Ruby Cup

Steriliser

Stainless steel heating chamber with silicone/plastic components

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern menstrual cup sterilizer; stainless core typical for appliances, but silicone/plastic parts unspecified, contact brand for material detail.

Risky category by default

Ruby Cup Steriliser Purple

Ruby Cup

Steriliser Purple

stainless steel steriliser/heating element

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; no high-risk coatings typical of this product category.

Risky category by default

More menstrual cups grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.