70/ 100
C
OverallF62/100
Rubbermaid Serving Bowl 2 Pack

Rubbermaid Reveal · Food Storage Containers

Rubbermaid Serving Bowl 2 Pack

C · Moderate

Lower-concern choice; basic plastic bowl with no reported coating or surface treatment.

Verdict: BuyPolypropylene bowl with no known coating hazards; basic plastic storage with standard food-contact safety profile and lower PFAS concern.

Rubbermaid Reveal serving bowls are simple polypropylene plastics without nonstick or water-resistant coatings, the typical source of PFAS in food containers. The brand makes no PFAS claims, and no public lab testing has flagged this product. As uncoated food-contact plastic, it presents lower PFAS risk than treated alternatives.

Shop Rubbermaid Reveal on Amazon →

Material

Plastic (polypropylene or similar), non-coated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Rubbermaid Reveal bowls are typically injection-molded polypropylene (PP, resin code 5), a rigid thermoplastic chosen for its durability, temperature resistance to ~100-120°C, and inertness with most foods. PP does not contain BPA or phthalates by design and is FDA-cleared for food contact. The 'non-coated' status means no additional enamel, ceramic, or polymer surface layer that could degrade or leach; the bowl is the material itself.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rubbermaid (Newell Brands subsidiary) does not publish detailed PFAS or chemical composition statements for consumer food containers. The company has faced no major recalls or documented contamination incidents for this product line. Rubbermaid containers meet FDA and standard food-contact regulations but offer limited transparency beyond 'BPA-free' marketing claims.

How it compares in its category

Polypropylene food bowls occupy the middle ground: safer than older melamine or polycarbonate (BPA risk), comparable to glass in chemical inertness, and more durable than rigid PET. Rubbermaid's mass-market positioning and 2-pack format reflect commodity-grade plastic storage; premium alternatives (borosilicate glass, stainless steel) avoid plastic leaching entirely but sacrifice breakage risk and cost.

If you buy it

Use these bowls for cold or warm (not hot) food storage; avoid microwave and dishwasher heat cycles that can stress the plastic and increase leaching risk over years. Inspect regularly for cracks, cloudiness, or odor, which signal degradation; replace after 3-5 years of regular use or if visible wear appears. Store away from direct sunlight and strong-smelling foods to prevent odor absorption.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

BPA/BPS leaching

Polypropylene formulation does not contain BPA or BPS by standard manufacturing. Rubbermaid does not use these compounds in this product line as of available documentation.

None known

Phthalate plasticizers

PP is inherently rigid and does not require phthalate plasticizers for flexibility. No known phthalate content in Rubbermaid Reveal bowls.

Possible

Microplastic shedding

Repeated heating, freezing, or mechanical wear (scratches, dishwasher abrasion) can degrade polypropylene surfaces and release small plastic particles, particularly if bowl is used in microwave over long periods. Risk increases with age and thermal cycling.

Possible

Monomer or oligomer leaching

PP can release oligomers (short polymer chains) and residual monomers at elevated temperatures or prolonged contact with fatty or acidic foods, though risk is lower than with other plastics. Heating in microwave accelerates this process.

None known

Coating degradation

As a non-coated bowl, there is no enamel, lacquer, or secondary surface layer to degrade or leach. This is a material advantage for this product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers

Caraway Food Storage Set

Caraway

Food Storage Set

Glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; glass + plastic lids with stated PFAS-free position, but no third-party verification of lid material.

Risky category by default

Caraway Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Caraway

Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern option; glass containers avoid PFAS coatings, but verify lid material before purchase.

Risky category by default

Caraway Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

Caraway

Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

borosilicate glass with non-PFAS lid

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Lower PFAS concern, glass container with stated non-PFAS lid, though third-party verification absent.

Risky category by default

More food storage containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.