70/ 100
C
OverallF62/100
Royal Canin Size Health Nutrition Medium Adult Dry Dog Food, 40 lb

Royal Canin · Pet Food Bags

Royal Canin Size Health Nutrition Medium Adult Dry Dog Food, 40 lb

C · Moderate

Lower concern for dry pet food packaging; standard paper bag unlikely to require PFAS-based water barriers.

Verdict: BuyDry pet food in standard cardboard bag; no established contamination or coating hazards; brand has no major safety recalls on record for this product line.

Royal Canin's medium adult dog food ships in a standard kraft paper bag, a conventional material not typically treated with PFAS-based grease or moisture barriers for dry kibble. The brand makes no PFAS claims.

Shop Royal Canin on Amazon →

Material

Paper/cardboard bag with standard interior coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Royal Canin Medium Adult comes in a paper/cardboard exterior bag with a standard interior plastic or wax-based moisture barrier. For dry kibble, this barrier prevents moisture ingress and keeps food shelf-stable without requiring PFAS-based fluorinated coatings (which are more common in grease-barrier applications for wet foods or fatty products). The kibble itself is the primary exposure pathway, not the bag material.

The brand's record and disclosure

Royal Canin (owned by Mars, Inc.) does not publicly disclose detailed PFAS or chemical use policies for pet food packaging. The brand has no major FDA recalls specific to chemical contamination in this dry food product line as of recent records. Mars has faced scrutiny on sustainability and ingredient transparency but not established safety failures for this particular product.

How it compares in its category

Dry pet food bags are lower-risk packaging than wet foods because they do not require grease-resistant coatings with PFAS. Royal Canin's positioning as a premium, veterinarian-backed brand means formulations are generally consistent with AAFCO standards. Comparable brands (Purina Pro Plan, Hill's Science Diet) use similar paper-based packaging with no systematic differences in chemical safety reported.

If you buy it

Store the opened bag in a cool, dry place and transfer kibble to airtight containers after opening to minimize moisture uptake and oxidation. Check the bag for visible damage or tears before purchase; do not use if the interior coating is visibly compromised or if kibble shows signs of mold or rancidity. Follow the printed expiration date; opened bags should be used within 2-3 weeks for optimal freshness.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Moisture barrier coating leachables (wax or plastic-based)

Standard paper bag liners for dry pet food do not intentionally use problematic leachable chemicals; no reported migration of coating into kibble in this product category at normal storage temperatures.

Possible

Mold or bacterial growth from bag damage or moisture

If the bag is torn, punctured, or stored in high humidity, moisture ingress can allow mold or mycotoxin development. This is a physical/storage risk, not inherent to the product.

Possible

Oxidation and rancidity of fats in kibble

Dry pet foods contain fats that can oxidize once the bag is opened and exposed to air. The paper bag itself does not prevent this; transfer to sealed containers slows the process.

None known

Heavy metals in ingredient sourcing (not packaging)

Royal Canin formulations are not known to have established heavy metal contamination; ingredients are sourced from regulated suppliers. This is a formulation risk, not a packaging hazard.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More pet food bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.