Rockport · Hiking Shoes & Trail Runners
Rockport Men's Hiking Shoe Cold Springs Plus Waterproof Size 6.5
Waterproof hiking shoe, waterproofing method and PFAS status undisclosed.
Rockport does not disclose water-repellent coating type or PFAS presence in this waterproof shoe. Standard waterproofing in footwear often uses fluorochemicals; seek brand confirmation or third-party testing for certainty.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather/textile upper with waterproof water-repellent coating, rubber sole
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This shoe combines leather and textile uppers with a rubber sole and a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating to achieve waterproofing. The leather upper is typically vegetable or chrome-tanned; chrome tanning is the industry standard but can release residual chromium if not properly finished. The textile components and synthetic overlays are often dyed with azo or reactive dyes; these are regulated in most markets but quality control varies. The water-repellent coating finish is the primary unknown: Rockport does not publicly disclose whether it uses PFAS-based or fluorocarbon-free water repellents, which is a critical gap in transparency.
The brand's record and disclosure
Rockport, owned by Berkshire Hathaway's Wolverine World Wide, has not published detailed chemical disclosure policies or third-party certifications (such as Leather Working Group environmental standards or bluesign approval) for this shoe line. The parent company faced legal settlements regarding PFAS contamination at manufacturing sites in Wisconsin, but this does not confirm PFAS use in finished products. Rockport's website does not specify waterproofing technology or provide ingredient lists, which is typical for footwear brands but represents a meaningful transparency gap for a premium hiking shoe.
How it compares in its category
Leather hiking boots at this price point (typically $100-150) commonly use either PFAS-based or fluorocarbon-free water-repellent coating finishes; Rockport's lack of disclosure puts it in the middle of the pack. Competitors like Merrell, Salomon, and REI Co-op brands increasingly label PFAS-free waterproofing or use waxed leather, making them more transparent. Leather durability and repairability are strengths of this shoe versus synthetic alternatives, which typically cannot be resoled and may off-gas volatile compounds during manufacturing and break-in.
If you buy it
Wear and air the shoe for at least one full day outdoors before extended use to allow initial water-repellent coating finish off-gassing to settle. Clean the upper with a soft brush and water only; avoid solvent-based cleaners that can strip or degrade the water-repellent coating and force reapplication. Inspect the waterproof seams and water-repellent coating after 6-12 months of use; reapply commercial water-repellent coating (such as Nikwax) if water no longer beads on the surface. Store in a cool, dry place; heat and UV exposure can degrade the coating and compromise the shoe's structural integrity.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Azo dyes in textile components
Textile dyes in the shoe's mesh and fabric overlays may include azo colorants, which are regulated but can cause allergic contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Rockport does not disclose dye chemistry or certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX), so risk level is unverified.
Chromium residues from leather tanning
Chrome-tanned leather is standard in this product category and is safe when properly finished, but poorly treated batches can leach low levels of chromium (VI), a known allergen and potential irritant. No specific testing for this shoe model is on record.
Formaldehyde in synthetic adhesives and finishes
Shoe adhesives and topcoats may contain formaldehyde as a curing agent or preservative. No recalls or public complaints specific to Rockport hiking shoes have been documented; this is a category-wide background risk.
water-repellent coating durability and reapplication safety
Commercial water-repellent coating reapplication products often contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and fluorinated compounds. Rockport's original finish degradation timeline and reapplication recommendations are not documented, leaving users to guess when and how to maintain waterproofing safely.
Rubber sole off-gassing during break-in
Synthetic rubber soles can emit volatile compounds (benzene, styrene) during the first days of wear, particularly if the shoe was recently manufactured. Proper ventilation during initial use minimizes exposure; no specific volatility data for Rockport soles is publicly available.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More hiking shoes & trail runners grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.