20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Garmont Men's Pinnacle Trek Gore-Tex Hiking Boots

Garmont · Hiking Shoes & Trail Runners

Garmont Men's Pinnacle Trek Gore-Tex Hiking Boots

F · High PFAS

Gore-Tex traditionally uses Teflon-type coating; Garmont does not disclose PFAS status.

Verdict: SkipSolid hiking boot with established durability; PFAS concern in Gore-Tex membrane and leather tanning not disclosed by Garmont; requires informed maintenance.

Gore-Tex waterproof membranes commonly contain Teflon-type coating-based chemistry, a Teflon-family coating associated with PFAS. Garmont provides no public PFAS disclosure for this model, making assessment difficult.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Gore-Tex membrane, leather, synthetic uppers

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These boots combine Gore-Tex waterproof membrane (a Teflon-type coating-based laminate) with leather and synthetic textile uppers. Gore-Tex itself is durable and breathable, but Teflon-type coating manufacturing and the membrane's Teflon-family coating backbone introduce PFAS compounds historically used in the production process. Leather uppers are treated with tanning agents and finishes; synthetic components may include polyester or nylon with various dyes and coatings. All three material streams can off-gas volatile compounds or leach finishes, especially when wet, heated, or worn intensively.

The brand's record and disclosure

Garmont is a mid-tier outdoor footwear brand without published material safety certifications, PFAS disclosure statements, or tannery transparency reports on public record. The company does not advertise BLUESIGN certification, Cradle to Cradle status, or restricted substance lists specific to this model. No major recalls or chemical safety controversies involving Garmont boots are documented in consumer safety databases, but this reflects limited public scrutiny rather than verified safety assurance.

How it compares in its category

Most performance hiking boots at this price point use Gore-Tex or similar Teflon-type coating-based membranes, so PFAS exposure is a category-wide concern, not unique to Garmont. Premium competitors like Salomon and La Sportiva sometimes provide restricted substance lists; budget alternatives using basic synthetic membranes avoid Teflon-type coating but sacrifice durability and breathability. Garmont occupies a middle ground with proven field performance but minimal transparency, typical of European outdoor brands not subject to EU Green Deal reporting yet.

If you buy it

Condition new boots gradually and avoid machine washing or heat drying, which can accelerate membrane degradation and off-gassing. Dry indoors at room temperature after each wet use; do not place near heaters or direct sunlight for extended periods. Inspect seams, stitching, and sole attachment annually; replace boots after 400-600 miles or visible membrane failure. Use non-solvent leather conditioners and allow full air-drying between applications to minimize chemical buildup in fibers.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

Teflon-type coating/PFAS in Gore-Tex membrane

Gore-Tex historically relies on Teflon-type coating (polytetrafluoroethylene), a Teflon-family coating containing or requiring PFAS in manufacturing. Garmont does not disclose whether this model uses PFAS-reduced or legacy Gore-Tex. Direct skin contact is minimal in boots, but moisture permeation and flexing can degrade the membrane over years, potentially releasing microparticles.

Possible

Leather tanning residues and heavy metals

The leather upper is treated with tanning compounds (chrome, vegetable, or synthetic); Garmont does not disclose tannery practices or finish composition. Chromium, lead, or cadmium in poorly regulated tannery effluent can bind to leather fibers. Prolonged skin contact, especially if sweating or in warm conditions, presents a pathway for absorption, though leather itself acts as a partial barrier.

Possible

Synthetic dye migration (azo dyes, antimony in polyester)

Synthetic textile reinforcements and linings may contain azo dyes or be polyester with antimony catalyst residues. Wet conditions and sweat (acidic) can accelerate dye bleeding or antimony leaching. This is a diffuse hazard across most synthetic footwear; Garmont provides no dye safety certification.

Possible

Formaldehyde-based adhesives in lamination

Gore-Tex lamination to textiles commonly uses adhesives containing formaldehyde resins or formaldehyde releasers. New boots may emit formaldehyde during initial wear, especially in warm or humid conditions. Odor is often the first indicator; ventilation and several days of air-drying before use reduce exposure.

Reported

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Gore-Tex membranes and urethane coatings degrade with UV exposure, temperature cycles, and mechanical stress. Microscopic flaking of the laminate is documented in long-term wear studies of similar boots. Shed particles may persist in soil and waterways; indoor disposal preferred over outdoor abandonment.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 55% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More hiking shoes & trail runners grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.