Revlon · Blush
revlon powder blush, mauvelous 003, 0.17 oz (5.0 g)
Lower concern; typical powder blush formulation carries minimal PFAS risk, though Revlon does not disclose.
Revlon's powder blush uses standard cosmetic powder ingredients (talc, mica, iron oxides) without inherent PFAS triggers like waterproofing, silicone films, or polymer coatings. Revlon has made no public PFAS disclosure for this product. No independent lab testing or recalls are publicly documented for this SKU.
Shop Revlon on Amazon →Material
powder blend (talc/mica base, iron oxides, binders)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This blush is a powder blend built on talc or mica (light-diffusing minerals), iron oxides (color pigments), and binders that hold the formula together. Talc has been scrutinized for asbestos contamination historically, but modern cosmetic-grade talc in the US is regulated and tested; mica is chemically inert and does not pose leaching or off-gassing risk. Iron oxides (CI 77491, 77492, 77499) are synthetic, non-toxic colorants approved for cosmetic use and do not migrate into skin.
The brand's record and disclosure
Revlon does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy-metal testing results, or talc-asbestos testing protocols on product pages or marketing materials. The brand has faced no major FDA enforcement actions or recalls specific to talc contamination or heavy metals in blushes in recent years. Revlon is a large publicly traded company with baseline regulatory compliance but does not pursue third-party certification (e.g., EWG Verified) or independent testing transparency.
How it compares in its category
Powder blushes using talc or mica bases are the industry standard and carry similar material-level safety profiles. Brands offering mica-only or certified organic alternatives (e.g., Lily Lolo, Bare Minerals) provide higher transparency but cost more. Revlon's formulation is typical for mass-market cosmetics; no category-wide scandal or reformulation trend affects this product.
If you buy it
Apply with a brush, not directly with fingers, to minimize inhalation of powder dust during use. Store in a cool, dry place and keep the lid closed to prevent settling and spillage. No special replacement trigger exists; discard if the powder hardens, separates, or develops an off odor (sign of contamination). Do not use if you have a known latex allergy, as some binders may contain latex-derived compounds, though Revlon does not advertise this risk.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Talc asbestos contamination
Cosmetic-grade talc sold in the US is subject to FDA asbestos testing rules, but Revlon does not publicly disclose talc supplier audits or batch-level testing. Risk is low under current regulation but not independently verified by the brand.
Heavy metals in iron oxide pigments
Synthetic iron oxides (CI 77491, 77492, 77499) used in cosmetics are processed to remove contaminants. No recalls or independent testing of this Revlon blush for lead, cadmium, or arsenic are on record.
Fragrance allergens
This blush formulation typically contains minimal or no fragrance. If fragrance is present, Revlon does not disclose individual allergen components (e.g., limonene, linalool), limiting risk assessment for sensitive individuals.
Powder inhalation risk
Repeated inhalation of fine cosmetic powder during application can cause respiratory irritation in sensitive individuals or with prolonged exposure in poorly ventilated spaces. This is a use-practice risk, not a formulation defect, but relevant to frequent users.
Mica source and labor ethics
Mica mining, particularly in India, has documented child labor concerns, but Revlon does not publicly commit to ethical sourcing or third-party audits of mica suppliers. No toxicological risk to the user, but relevant to supply-chain transparency.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More blush grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.