75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Revlon Powder Blush Ravishing Rose

Revlon · Blush

Revlon Powder Blush Ravishing Rose

C · Moderate

Lower concern, powder blush typically relies on mineral pigments without intentional PFAS chemistry, but no public testing or disclosure available.

Verdict: BuyPowder blush with standard mineral pigment base; no major non-PFAS hazards on record; brand transparency limited but product class low-risk.

Revlon Powder Blush is a cosmetic powder with no known PFAS-prone ingredients like Teflon-family coating or water-repellent treatments. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS policy or third-party testing.

Shop Revlon on Amazon →

Material

Powder blend (talc/mica base, iron oxides, binders)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Revlon Powder Blush Ravishing Rose is formulated as a talc or mica-based powder blend with iron oxide pigments and binding agents. Talc in cosmetics has been a longstanding consumer concern due to historical contamination with asbestos in some supplies, though modern cosmetic-grade talc is regulated and tested for asbestos absence in the US. The iron oxides used for color are inert mineral pigments with low toxicity when applied topically and not inhaled chronically. Binders in powder formulations are typically silicones or polymeric resins that adhere pigment without leaching into skin during normal use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Revlon does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, supply-chain testing, or heavy metal screening results for this product. The brand has faced historical class-action litigation over talc asbestos contamination (settled in 2021 regarding legacy products) but current formulations are required to meet FDA cosmetic regulations. Revlon does not publish third-party safety certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Cruelty-Free certifications are absent from official marketing). Transparency on PFAS use or non-use is absent from public statements.

How it compares in its category

Powder blushes as a category carry lower chemical hazard profiles than cream or liquid formulations because they avoid water-based preservative systems and volatile solvents. Revlon's formulation is conventional and represents mainstream cosmetic manufacturing; indie or clean-beauty brands often highlight talc-free or mica-free formulations as a marketing distinction, implying some consumer unease with these minerals. Budget-tier powder blushes like Revlon's typically use fewer proprietary actives and more basic pigment loads, which can reduce exposure to trace contaminants but also mean less quality control transparency.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from humidity to prevent cake or bacterial growth in the compact. Avoid inhaling powder directly during application; tap off excess and apply with a brush to minimize airborne particles entering respiratory tract. Replace if the surface becomes moldy or develops an off-odor, which indicates moisture infiltration. If you have a known talc sensitivity or family history of talc-related illness, consider talc-free blush alternatives; otherwise, occasional topical use poses minimal risk under normal cosmetic use patterns.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Talc and asbestos contamination

Talc deposits historically contained asbestos; modern cosmetic-grade talc is regulated and tested in the US, but no public third-party testing results are available for this specific Revlon batch. Risk is low under current FDA oversight but historically documented in older Revlon products.

None known

Heavy metals in iron oxide pigments

Iron oxides (red 130, red 227, yellow 42, brown 20, black 2) used in blush are generally recognized as safe and inert when applied topically. No recall or contamination data exists for Revlon's specific pigment supply.

Possible

Inhalation hazard from powder particles

Chronic inhalation of talc or mica powder can pose respiratory irritation or lung burden; this is a user-practice issue, not a formulation toxicity issue. Single or occasional applications pose negligible risk; heavy daily use warrants concern.

None known

Formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasers in binders

Powder blushes do not typically require formaldehyde-release preservatives (unlike aqueous creams). No public data suggests Revlon uses formaldehyde releasers in this product.

None known

Fragrance allergens

Revlon Powder Blush Ravishing Rose is unscented or minimally fragranced. No allergen declarations or fragrance component disclosures are on public record for this SKU.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More blush grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.