Puma · Athletic Insoles & Orthotics
Move Game Day Pro Ultimate Performance Insoles
Moisture-wicking insoles likely use water-resistant treatments; Puma discloses nothing about PFAS.
Performance insoles typically feature water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS. Puma provides no PFAS information or third-party verification for this product.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
foam cushioning with moisture-wicking top layer, likely polyurethane or EVA with unspecified coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Move Game Day Pro insoles use foam cushioning (likely polyurethane EVA blend) with an unspecified moisture-wicking top layer. The wicking function almost certainly involves water-resistant chemical treatments (possible PFAS, Teflon-family coating, or silicone coatings), but Puma provides no material specification. Foam degradation accelerates with heat, sweat exposure, and UV, releasing microscopic particles over time. The lack of transparency on the coating chemistry means you cannot verify which water-resistance technology is used.
The brand's record and disclosure
Puma has not published a PFAS restriction or disclosure policy as of public record; this is notably silent compared to competitors like Adidas and Nike, which have committed to PFAS phase-outs in textile and coating applications. Puma does not specify material safety for performance footwear components on product pages. The brand has faced criticism for opacity on textile chemical use, though no specific insole recalls or safety violations are established. Absence of disclosure is not proof of hazard, but it blocks informed choice.
How it compares in its category
Performance insoles are typically made from EVA or polyurethane foam with moisture treatments; this product sits in the mainstream performance tier. Alternatives like Superfeet or Powerstep disclose material composition more openly, though they also do not always specify PFAS status. Gel and cork insoles (e.g., Birkenstock) avoid synthetic coatings but sacrifice moisture wicking. For athletes in high-sweat environments, the unspecified coating trade-off is common across brands, making this product typical rather than exceptional.
If you buy it
Keep insoles clean and dry between uses; store in a breathable pouch rather than sealed bags to prevent bacterial or mold growth. Replace every 6-12 months, as foam loses cushioning and coating integrity degrades with repeated sweat and heat exposure. Do not wash in hot water or dry in direct sunlight, which accelerates breakdown. If you have sensitivities to fragrance or synthetic coatings, test fit briefly before full-day use.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Moisture-wicking coating chemistry (unspecified)
Water-resistant treatments on insole tops typically use fluorochemicals, silicones, or polyurethane resins. Puma discloses none of these; the specific compound is unknown. Possible exposure is dermal contact and inhalation of volatile compounds during storage or use in warm feet environments.
Polyurethane foam degradation and particle release
EVA and polyurethane foams degrade under repeated mechanical stress, moisture, and temperature cycling. Microscopic foam particles and oligomers can be released into sweat and absorbed transdermally. No quantified risk data exists for insole-specific exposure, but degradation is inevitable after 6-12 months.
Bacterial and fungal growth in moisture-retaining foam
Insoles create a warm, damp microenvironment favorable to bacterial and fungal colonization. This is a known issue across all foam insole products, not specific to Puma. Risk is mitigated by regular drying and replacement; not a chemical hazard but a hygiene concern.
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-gassing from foam and coating
New polyurethane and EVA foams typically emit low levels of VOCs (aldehydes, ketones) during the first weeks of use. The unspecified coating may also release volatile compounds in warm conditions (sweat, exercise). Ventilation during initial use and storage in an aerated space reduces inhalation exposure.
Azo dyes or synthetic pigments in top layer
No specific safety alerts or recalls exist for Puma insole dyes. However, the moisture-wicking layer may contain synthetic colorants not disclosed on packaging. Risk is low but unverified due to lack of material transparency.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Athletic Insoles & Orthotics
Vionic
Active Full Insole
Foam cushioning, textile upper
Lower concern; typical insole without known PFAS drivers.
⚠Risky category by default
Vionic
Women's Slim Fit Insole
foam, gel, or textile insole construction
Insole material is inherently lower PFAS risk; no brand disclosure found.
⚠Risky category by default
Vionic
Unisex Active Orthotic Full Length Insole
EVA foam, fabric backing, polyurethane adhesive
Lower concern insole; common foam materials, no waterproofing treatment indicated.
⚠Risky category by default
More athletic insoles & orthotics grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.