65/ 100
D
OverallF57/100
Vionic Unisex Active Orthotic Full Length Insole

Vionic · Athletic Insoles & Orthotics

Vionic Unisex Active Orthotic Full Length Insole

D · Elevated

Lower concern insole; common foam materials, no waterproofing treatment indicated.

Verdict: SkipEVA foam insoles with no established safety recalls; lower PFAS concern and typical adhesive risks manageable with proper care.

Vionic insoles use standard EVA foam and fabric, materials not typically treated with PFAS. Brand discloses no PFAS information; no independent testing found.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

EVA foam, fabric backing, polyurethane adhesive

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Vionic's orthotic insoles use EVA (ethylene-vinyl acetate) foam as the core material, a closed-cell polymer widely used in footwear for cushioning and arch support. The fabric backing and polyurethane adhesive are standard in this category. EVA does not contain phthalates or BPA by default, and polyurethane adhesives in shoe insoles are not a primary leaching pathway since they bond materials together rather than contact food or skin directly.

The brand's record and disclosure

Vionic has not published detailed chemical disclosures or third-party safety certifications (such as Oeko-Tex or bluesign) for this product line, which is typical for orthotic brands but limits transparency. No recalls or substantiated safety incidents are on record for Vionic insoles. The company's silence on PFAS aligns with most insole manufacturers, suggesting no water-resistant or stain-guard treatments are applied to this product.

How it compares in its category

EVA foam insoles are the industry standard for over-the-counter orthotics and are generally considered lower-risk than gel or memory-foam alternatives (which can off-gas VOCs). Vionic's use of polyurethane adhesive is conventional; competitors often use similar bonding. Without waterproofing chemicals, this product avoids the PFAS burden that some premium or moisture-resistant insoles carry, placing it in the safer mid-range of the category.

If you buy it

Store insoles in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight, which can degrade EVA over 1-2 years of regular use. Do not microwave or place in hot water; hand-wash with mild soap if needed. Replace when cushioning noticeably flattens or foam surface cracks, typically every 12-24 months depending on activity level. Check for adhesive separation at the edges and discontinue use if backing begins to peel.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Polyurethane adhesive degradation and skin contact

Polyurethane adhesives used to bond insole layers can degrade over time or in high-moisture environments, potentially releasing residual unreacted isocyanates or oligomers. Direct skin contact with degraded backing is uncommon but possible if insole backing peels; risk is low in typical use but increases if insole is worn without shoes or after extended moisture exposure.

None known

EVA foam off-gassing

EVA foam is not a documented source of VOC off-gassing in the literature, and Vionic insoles show no recalls or complaints related to chemical odor. New insoles may have a mild plastic smell that dissipates within days; this is cosmetic rather than a health signal.

Possible

Microplastics from foam degradation

Repetitive compression and foot friction can cause gradual particle shedding from EVA foam, especially if the surface becomes abraded. These microparticles are not absorbed through skin and are typically shed into socks and shoes rather than the body, but may accumulate in the environment with disposal.

None known

Formaldehyde in fabric backing

No formaldehyde-containing resins are standard in polyurethane-backed fabrics used for insole liners. Vionic provides no test results to confirm absence, but this hazard is not typical for this material combination and no incidents have been reported.

None known

Heavy metals in dyes or pigments

The fabric backing is not documented as a source of azo dyes or pigments with heavy metals. Vionic does not disclose dye chemistry, but insole backings are functional rather than decorative and rarely use problematic colorants; no recalls suggest this is a non-issue.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More athletic insoles & orthotics grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.