Plackers · Dental Floss
Plackers Gentle Line Floss Picks Fresh Mint 75 Count
Lower PFAS concern; simple floss pick with no water-repellent or grease-resistant finish.
Plackers Gentle Line floss picks are basic single-use dental hygiene tools made from nylon floss and plastic components. The product has no waterproofing, stain-resistance, or nonstick coating, the typical mechanisms that introduce PFAS into consumer goods.
Shop Plackers on Amazon →Material
Nylon filament floss with plastic handle and clip
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Plackers Gentle Line uses nylon monofilament floss wound on a plastic handle with a small spring clip. Nylon is a synthetic polymer that does not leach bisphenol A (BPA) or phthalates under normal mouth conditions, and the filament is inert in the oral cavity where exposure is brief and non-ingestion. The plastic handle is not exposed to heat during use and contact is external to the mouth, so leaching risks are negligible. Fresh mint flavoring is applied as a surface coating and is a food-grade additive at typical concentrations used in dental products.
The brand's record and disclosure
Plackers (owned by Edgewell Personal Care) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party safety testing for its floss picks. The product carries no warning labels or known recalls related to chemical hazards. The brand has not faced documented litigation or regulatory action regarding manufacturing safety or material composition for this product line. No formal certifications (e.g., Clean Label Project, NSF) are advertised for Plackers floss.
How it compares in its category
Floss picks are among the lowest-risk oral care products because contact is transient and the dosage of any leachable substance is negligible. Compared to traditional string floss, picks eliminate concerns about microplastics from degrading nylon if consumed; compared to water flossers, they require no electronic components or storage of contaminated reservoirs. Most dental floss products, including Plackers competitors (Oral-B, GUM, Curaprox), use similar nylon monofilament and plastic handles with comparable hazard profiles.
If you buy it
Store picks in a dry environment to prevent mold growth in the package. Do not heat or leave in direct sunlight for extended periods, as plastic handles may soften (though typical mouth temperature is safe). Replace picks if the nylon becomes frayed or the clip loosens. Discard after use; do not reuse picks for oral hygiene.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Microplastic shedding from nylon filament
Nylon floss can shed microscopic fibers during aggressive use or if frayed. Swallowing small amounts is unlikely to pose acute harm, but cumulative ingestion from repeated use is not well-studied in humans.
Allergic reaction to mint flavoring or additives
Fresh mint flavorings may trigger contact sensitivity in individuals with spearmint or peppermint allergies, though reactions are typically mild and localized to the mouth.
BPA/BPS in plastic handle
No published evidence or recalls indicate BPA or BPS in Plackers floss pick handles. Nylon itself does not require BPA as a plasticizer, and modern manufacturers of this category typically avoid it.
Heavy metals in dyes or coatings
Plackers does not disclose colorants or their origins. Floss picks are not subject to FDA color additive regulations for cosmetics, but lead/cadmium contamination in plastic handles would be unusual and is not documented in this product.
Bacterial colonization on reused picks
Floss picks are single-use; reuse allows bacterial biofilm to accumulate in the clip mechanism and filament crevices, increasing infection risk. This is a use-practice hazard, not a material hazard.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Dental Floss
Cocofloss
Refill Trio
Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating
Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Dental Lace
Refillable Silk Dental Floss
Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging
Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Dental Lace
Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-
Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)
Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.
⚠Risky category by default
More dental floss grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.