75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Dental Plackers Micro Mint

Plackers · Dental Floss

Dental Plackers Micro Mint

C · Moderate

Lower-concern dental pick; no known PFAS risk but brand transparency lacking.

Verdict: BuyNylon dental picks pose minimal established hazard; brand lacks transparency but product class shows no documented contamination risk.

Plackers Micro Mint dental picks are simple nylon-filament picks with a plastic handle, standard materials not typically associated with PFAS use in this product category. No lab data or brand claims about PFAS are publicly available.

Shop Plackers on Amazon →

Material

Nylon filament picks with plastic handle

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Dental Plackers Micro Mint picks are constructed from nylon filament (the working floss element) mounted on a plastic handle, typically polystyrene or similar rigid polymer. Nylon is a synthetic polymer with low migration risk in oral use because contact is brief, saliva pH is neutral, and no heat or acidic foods are involved. The plastic handle does not contact food or prolonged mouth contact, further limiting leaching concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Plackers (owned by Edgewell Personal Care) does not publish material safety data sheets or chemical transparency statements for this product. The brand has not faced documented recalls or safety controversies related to dental picks. No third-party certifications (e.g., FDA cleared device status, BPA-free claims) are prominently advertised, suggesting minimal proactive disclosure relative to competitors in the oral care space.

How it compares in its category

Dental picks/floss alternatives fall into nylon picks, traditional string floss, and wooden/bamboo picks. Nylon picks like Plackers are mid-range in terms of material hazard profile: lower concern than string floss (which may use synthetic polymers or natural cellulose with binding agents) and comparable to other mass-market plastic-handled picks. No established hazard data distinguishes Plackers from generic nylon pick competitors.

If you buy it

Dental picks are single-use or limited-use consumables; replace when bristles fray or filament breaks. Store in a dry environment to prevent mold growth on the nylon and plastic surfaces. Do not heat or place in hot water, as nylon can soften above 80°C (176°F), though routine mouth temperature exposure poses no risk. Keep out of reach of children under 3 due to choking hazard (unrelated to chemical safety).

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Nylon filament degradation and particle shedding

Nylon floss can fragment if overused or caught on sharp tooth surfaces. Swallowed nylon particles are generally not absorbed and pass through the GI tract; no toxicity risk is established, but mechanical obstruction is a theoretical concern in very young children.

None known

Plastic handle leachables (polystyrene or polyethylene)

The plastic handle does not contact saliva for extended periods and is not chewed or heated. Polystyrene leaching of BPA or phthalates is not documented for dental picks because oral exposure time and mechanism are minimal. No recalls or complaints link Plackers handles to chemical migration.

Possible

Mold or bacterial growth on unused picks

If stored in a damp bathroom or left wet, nylon and plastic surfaces can accumulate mold or bacteria over weeks. This is a hygiene rather than chemical hazard and is easily prevented by air drying and cool, dry storage.

None known

Mint flavoring or additives

Plackers Micro Mint may carry mint flavoring agents (typically menthol or synthetic mint compounds). These are safe at trace levels in oral care products; no documented allergic reactions or toxicity are on record for this product. Individuals with mint sensitivity should opt for unflavored picks.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Cocofloss Refill Trio

Cocofloss

Refill Trio

Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.

Risky category by default

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Dental Lace

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Dental Lace

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.