70/ 100
C
OverallF62/100
Pixie Cup Pixie Soft Menstrual Disc

Pixie Cup · Menstrual Cups

Pixie Cup Pixie Soft Menstrual Disc

C · Moderate

Lower-concern product; silicone discs unlikely to require PFAS, but brand offers no assurance.

Verdict: BuyMedical-grade silicone disc with no established hazards; PFAS status unclear but silicone unlikely to require it. Brand transparency on materials is adequate.

Pixie Soft Menstrual Disc is made from medical-grade silicone, a material class not typically treated with PFAS coatings. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or make PFAS-free claims. No third-party certifications or lab data are publicly available, leaving a small gap in transparency for a reusable intimate-care product.

Shop Pixie Cup on Amazon →

Material

Medical-grade silicone

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Pixie Soft is constructed from medical-grade silicone, a synthetic polymer designed for internal bodily contact and typically free of BPA, phthalates, and latex. Medical-grade silicone used in menstrual products undergoes biocompatibility testing to minimize leaching of additives or degradation products into tissue. Silicone does not require Teflon-type coating or similar coatings, and the closed disc design (rather than cup with air holes) further reduces surface area for potential chemical migration. Unlike some lower-cost silicone products, medical-grade formulations are more stable under the warm, moist vaginal environment.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pixie Cup provides material composition on packaging and website but does not publish third-party testing certificates or detailed information about additives, colorants, or vulcanization by-products in the silicone. The brand has not publicly committed to PFAS avoidance or disclosed supply chain audits. No recalls, safety alerts, or adverse event patterns linked to Pixie products are recorded in FDA or CPSC databases. Lack of transparency is typical of smaller menstrual-product brands but leaves users without independent verification of material purity.

How it compares in its category

Menstrual discs (flat, seated against the cervix) are a newer category than cups; Pixie's soft-silicone design is similar to competitors like Lumma and Nixit in material class. Most established brands in this space use medical-grade silicone without reported health incidents over years of use. Pixie's pricing and marketing position it as accessible rather than premium, which sometimes correlates with less rigorous material QA but not necessarily hazard risk. The disc format itself does not pose greater chemical risk than cup alternatives if silicone quality is maintained.

If you buy it

Wash thoroughly with fragrance-free soap before first use and after each cycle. Medical-grade silicone tolerates boiling (sanitization at 100C) without degradation, which is important because reusable menstrual products require periodic heat disinfection to prevent bacterial colonization. Replace after 2-3 years or if you notice discoloration, sticky texture, or odor that soap does not remove, as these signs indicate silicone breakdown. Store in a breathable cloth pouch, not sealed plastic, to prevent mold growth in the moist environment.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Silicone degradation and leachable additives

Medical-grade silicone is formulated with catalysts, processing aids, and sometimes colorants; long-term heating or friction can release trace additives. No published studies document leaching from Pixie Soft specifically, but all silicone products carry theoretical risk if manufacturing controls are inconsistent.

Possible

Bacterial colonization and infection risk

Any reusable internal menstrual product can harbor bacteria if not boiled regularly or if air-dry storage allows mold. This is a user-behavior hazard rather than a material defect, but Pixie's instructions must be followed precisely to avoid toxic shock syndrome or other infection risk common to all menstrual devices.

None known

Latex or allergen cross-contamination in manufacturing

Pixie Soft is advertised as latex-free and is medical-grade silicone; no recalls or reports of latex residue exist. However, Pixie does not publish facility certifications or allergen-control procedures, so cross-contamination during manufacture cannot be ruled out with certainty.

None known

Heavy metals or pigment impurities in colorants

Colored menstrual products sometimes use iron oxides or other pigments; Pixie Soft comes in a limited color range. No safety testing or complaints regarding metal contamination have been reported, but the brand does not disclose pigment suppliers or testing.

None known

Packaging material leaching during storage

Pixie Soft ships in cardboard and plastic clamshell; the disc itself does not contact packaging after opening. Standard consumer-packaging materials pose no direct hazard to the product, though users should store the disc in a supplied or personal breathable pouch, not in the original plastic.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Menstrual Cups

DIVA Cup Model 2

Aisle

DIVA Cup Model 2

Medical-grade silicone (body); no Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower-concern menstrual cup; silicone construction and PFAS-free commitment make it a reasonable choice.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Ruby Cup Steriliser

Ruby Cup

Steriliser

Stainless steel heating chamber with silicone/plastic components

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern menstrual cup sterilizer; stainless core typical for appliances, but silicone/plastic parts unspecified, contact brand for material detail.

Risky category by default

Ruby Cup Steriliser Purple

Ruby Cup

Steriliser Purple

stainless steel steriliser/heating element

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; no high-risk coatings typical of this product category.

Risky category by default

More menstrual cups grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.