75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Dr.Collins Perio FlossPics

Perioe · Dental Floss

Dr.Collins Perio FlossPics

C · Moderate

Lower-concern product; no waterproofing or special coatings typical of PFAS use.

Verdict: BuyBamboo-nylon floss picks with no reported hazards; simple material profile and low PFAS risk make this a safe dental care choice.

Perio FlossPicks are basic interdental cleaning tools made from wood and nylon bristles, materials not typically treated with PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claim and provides no third-party testing, but the simple construction and lack of water-repellent or non-stick coatings suggest lower risk.

Shop Perioe on Amazon →

Material

wood/bamboo stick, nylon bristle picks

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Dr. Collins Perio FlossPics consist of a bamboo stick handle with nylon bristle floss woven or attached at one end. Bamboo is a natural, untreated wood substrate that carries minimal chemical risk when properly processed; nylon bristles are inert plastics stable at room temperature and unlikely to shed or leach when used as designed in the mouth. The combination avoids common hazard materials like PVC, BPA-containing plastics, or resin-coated wood, making material chemistry straightforward and low-risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

Perioe (the manufacturer) has not published detailed material safety data, certifications (such as ISO, FDA clearance details), or ingredient transparency statements in publicly available sources. No recalls, adverse event reports, or safety controversies have been recorded for this product. The brand's silence on PFAS stance is typical of small oral care manufacturers and does not indicate use; the simple material composition makes PFAS treatment unlikely.

How it compares in its category

Floss picks are one of the lowest-complexity dental care products and carry minimal chemical exposure compared to electric toothbrushes (electronics, batteries), whitening strips (peroxide), or mouthwashes (preservatives, dyes). Bamboo-nylon combinations are considered a safer alternative to plastic-only or resin-reinforced picks. This product sits in the mainstream safety tier for floss picks; no material trade-offs vs. higher-priced competitors.

If you buy it

Store in a dry place to prevent bamboo moisture absorption and mold growth on nylon bristles. Replace individual picks if bristles fray, splinter, or show visible wear; nylon fibers can theoretically become aspiratable if severely degraded, though this is uncommon. Rinse under water after use to remove food debris and allow air drying. Avoid prolonged soaking or dishwasher use, which may degrade the bamboo-nylon bond.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Bamboo degradation and splinter risk

Natural bamboo can develop surface splintering if wetted repeatedly or stored in high humidity. Splinters are a mechanical hazard, not chemical, but ingestion of wood fragments is unlikely during normal flossing use.

Possible

Nylon bristle shedding

Worn or poorly manufactured nylon bristles may shed loose fibers into the mouth. This is a physical hazard (choking/aspiration risk is very low in adults) rather than a toxicological one; nylon itself is biologically inert.

Possible

Mold or bacterial growth on bristles

If stored wet or in damp conditions, nylon bristles and the bamboo-bristle junction can develop microbial biofilm. This is a hygiene issue, not a chemical leaching risk; regular drying mitigates this.

None known

Adhesive or binding agent leaching

No information is publicly available about the glue or binding method used to attach nylon bristles to bamboo. If present, typical floss-pick adhesives are not known to leach; however, confirmation from the manufacturer would strengthen this assessment.

None known

Dyes or coatings on bamboo

No records indicate that Dr. Collins Perio FlossPicks use dyes, lacquers, or resin coatings that could introduce heavy metals or formaldehyde resins. Bamboo is often left natural or lightly treated; if colored, food-safe dyes are typical.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Cocofloss Refill Trio

Cocofloss

Refill Trio

Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.

Risky category by default

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Dental Lace

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Dental Lace

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.