40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
Pelican Voyager Holster Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max

Pelican · Waterproof Smartphone & Tech Cases

Pelican Voyager Holster Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max

F · High PFAS

Skip until Pelican discloses waterproof treatment chemistry.

Verdict: SkipPolyurethane holster with undisclosed waterproof coating poses moderate PFAS risk; no other documented hazards, but Pelican's silence on chemistry warrants cautious use pending disclosure.

Pelican Voyager cases use waterproof coatings but do not publicly disclose whether PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments are used. No third-party verification available.

The safe swap

Tech21 EvoClear for Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Tech21

Tech21 EvoClear for Apple iPhone 17 Pro

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyurethane/elastomer with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This case is constructed from polyurethane or elastomer base material with an unspecified waterproof coating applied to the exterior. Polyurethane itself is chemically stable at room temperature and does not leach BPA or phthalates under normal phone-use conditions. The waterproof treatment is the critical unknown: water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes on elastomer goods are commonly based on fluorinated compounds (PFAS), which can migrate into skin contact or dust when worn. Without Pelican's disclosure of the coating chemistry, you cannot rule out persistent fluorochemicals.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pelican is known for rugged protective cases and has not published formal PFAS phase-out commitments or water-repellent coating treatment transparency as of publicly available information. The company has not faced major chemical safety recalls specific to phone cases, but their silence on waterproof coating composition is conspicuous in an industry where competitors (e.g., OtterBox) have begun disclosing or eliminating legacy PFAS treatments. Pelican's stance suggests either use of older fluorinated chemistries or unwillingness to communicate ingredient safety, both warrant caution.

How it compares in its category

Phone case materials range from simple silicone (no coating risk) to polyurethane and TPE with waterproof treatments (higher PFAS exposure risk). Pelican cases prioritize durability and water resistance, placing them at the higher-risk end of the spectrum for PFAS-coated elastomers. Competitors like Spigen and Casetify increasingly offer waterproof alternatives using disclosed non-fluorinated hydrophobic methods or mechanical barriers. This product's lack of transparency makes direct comparison difficult but suggests Pelican has not adopted newer safer coating chemistries.

If you buy it

Minimize skin contact with the exterior coating, especially prolonged palm contact during warm conditions when migration risk is highest. Do not apply heat (e.g., near sunlight or vents) for extended periods, as elevated temperature can increase leaching of waterproof additives. Wash hands after extended use, particularly if the case shows wear or discoloration (signs of coating breakdown). Request Pelican's water-repellent coating treatment chemistry before purchase if you are pregnant, immunocompromised, or concerned about PFAS exposure; if they decline, consider alternatives with published non-fluorinated coatings.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in waterproof coating

Undisclosed water-repellent coating finish on polyurethane is likely fluorinated based on industry standard practice; migration risk is low during casual handling but increases with skin contact frequency and temperature. Pelican's refusal to disclose coating chemistry prevents assessment of specific PFAS burden (legacy C8 vs. newer short-chain alternatives).

None known

Polyurethane off-gassing (VOC)

Polyurethane elastomers used in phone cases do not typically release volatile organic compounds at room temperature. Off-gassing is not a documented concern for rigid or semi-rigid polyurethane cases with cured coatings.

Possible

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Over months to years, the waterproof coating may crack, peel, or degrade, especially if exposed to abrasion, UV light, or cleaning solvents. Degraded fluorinated coating can shed particles; mechanical contact or washing may accelerate this process.

None known

Allergic contact dermatitis from coating additives

No specific allergens have been reported in Pelican phone cases. Polyurethane and common water-repellent coating additives are not typical sensitizers, but individual reactions to unidentified coating components cannot be ruled out without full ingredient disclosure.

None known

Leaching of plasticizers or flame retardants from polyurethane

Polyurethane used in rigid or semi-rigid cases is not formulated with the phthalates or brominated flame retardants common in flexible plastics. Leeching of such compounds from this product type is not a documented hazard.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Smartphone & Tech Cases

Tech21 EvoClear for Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Tech21

EvoClear for Apple iPhone 17 Pro

polycarbonate and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Polycarbonate phone case.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Apple TechWoven MagSafe Case for iPhone 17 Pro

Apple

TechWoven MagSafe Case for iPhone 17 Pro

Woven fabric composite with elastomer MagSafe attachment

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Limited PFAS risk from material choice, but no brand disclosure

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max TechWoven Case with MagSafe

Apple

iPhone 17 Pro Max TechWoven Case with MagSafe

Woven textile blend with MagSafe metal ring

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; typical smartphone case materials lack PFAS triggers.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof smartphone & tech cases grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.