Anccer · Waterproof Smartphone & Tech Cases
Anker MagGo Magnetic Case with Stand
Typical phone case, no known PFAS concerns, brand offers no disclosure.
Phone cases use thermoplastic polyurethane and synthetic fabrics, not typically formulated with PFAS. Anccer does not publicly disclose PFAS status.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
TPU plastic shell, fabric/synthetic lining
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Anker MagGo case uses TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) for the shell, a soft plastic chosen for drop protection and grip. TPU is a lower-migration polymer compared to rigid plastics, meaning it sheds fewer chemicals into your hands or phone over time. The synthetic fabric lining (typically polyester or nylon blend) provides shock absorption but is a secondary concern since it does not contact food or skin directly for extended periods.
The brand's record and disclosure
Anker (through its Anccer subsidiary) does not publicly disclose material certifications, chemical testing results, or PFAS avoidance commitments, which is standard silence in the phone accessory market rather than a red flag. No product recalls, lead contamination, or chemical safety incidents have been published for this model. The brand maintains routine compliance with regional safety standards (FCC, CE) but does not voluntarily exceed them.
How it compares in its category
Phone cases occupy a lower-risk category than cookware or cosmetics because they avoid heat exposure, food contact, and direct prolonged skin contact. TPU cases sit mid-range: more stable than cheap PVC but less transparent about sourcing than premium cases from brands like OtterBox or Spigen that publish material safety data. Magnetic phone cases across brands use similar TPU formulations with no known category-wide safety issues.
If you buy it
Keep the case away from sustained heat above 60°C (140°F) to avoid TPU softening or minor off-gassing of volatile compounds. Wash hands after prolonged contact if you have sensitive skin, as fabric dyes and TPU additives can occasionally irritate. Inspect regularly for tears or peeling; discard if the shell degrades and fragments begin shedding. The case requires no special maintenance beyond wiping clean; fabric lining benefits from air-drying if damp.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
TPU plasticizer leaching
TPU contains plasticizers to maintain flexibility; exposure to skin oils and heat can slowly leach trace amounts. Risk is minimal for brief daily contact with hands but unknown if case remains in pockets for hours. No specific data on Anker MagGo composition.
Synthetic fabric dyes and finishes
Polyester or nylon lining may be treated with azo dyes or antimicrobial finishes. Anker does not disclose dye chemistry. Direct skin contact is limited, reducing migrationrisk compared to apparel.
VOC off-gassing
New TPU cases can emit volatile organic compounds (solvents, plasticizers) for the first weeks of use, particularly in warm environments. This is reversible and typically resolves with ventilation; it is not a toxicity hazard at room temperature.
Adhesive and bonding agent stability
Magnetic attachments and lining adhesives are factory-sealed and not exposed to user contact. No degradation or leaching hazards are documented for this product model.
Microplastic shedding from wear
Prolonged flexing, dropping, or friction can degrade TPU over months to years, potentially creating small plastic fragments. This is a durability and environmental concern rather than an immediate safety hazard to the user.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More waterproof smartphone & tech cases grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.