40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
Pelican Ranger iPhone 16 Pro

Pelican · Waterproof Electronics Cases

Pelican Ranger iPhone 16 Pro

F · High PFAS

Limited public PFAS data on case. Contact Pelican for waterproofing details.

Verdict: SkipPolycarbonate phone case with no established chemical hazards; PFAS waterproofing uncertain but not unusual for protective gear. Contact brand if concerned.

Pelican cases use proprietary sealing and gaskets for waterproofing but do not publicly disclose PFAS use or absence. Waterproof coatings sometimes contain PFAS; verification requires direct brand inquiry.

The safe swap

Mous MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case

Mous

Mous MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polycarbonate shell, likely with water/dust-resistant sealing

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Ranger iPhone 16 Pro uses polycarbonate (PC), a rigid engineering plastic chosen for drop protection and clarity. Polycarbonate itself does not leach BPA during normal use at room temperature, though older PC formulations may contain trace BPA as a residual monomer. The sealing adhesives and water-resistant gaskets are the actual chemical wildcard; their composition is not publicly detailed by Pelican.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pelican is a long-established protective equipment manufacturer with no public health controversies or recalls tied to chemical leaching from phone cases. The company does not openly disclose material sourcing, chemical composition, or third-party testing for consumer cases. Their water-resistance claims rely on mechanical sealing design rather than public certification (e.g., no IEC 60529 rating statement found).

How it compares in its category

Rigid polycarbonate cases are the mainstream choice for protective phone accessories and carry minimal documented chemical risk compared to soft TPU or vinyl alternatives, which can off-gas plasticizers. Pelican's brand heritage in military and industrial protection gives it higher assumed quality control than budget or novelty cases. Most competitors in this price tier use identical PC and similar sealed gasket designs without disclosure.

If you buy it

Store away from direct sunlight and heat sources above 60 degrees Celsius to avoid any minor stress-cracking of PC over years. The sealing gaskets should remain effective indefinitely if kept dry; no routine maintenance is needed. If water intrusion occurs, discontinue use and dry thoroughly. Replace if cracks appear, as they compromise both drop protection and water resistance.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

BPA residual monomer leaching

Polycarbonate cases do not typically leach BPA into food or skin during normal handling. Risk would be negligible even if trace BPA exists in the raw material, as the case does not contact mucous membranes or food.

Possible

Waterproofing adhesive/gasket leachables

Pelican does not publicly specify the chemical composition of sealing gaskets or bonding adhesives. Common sealants may contain residual solvents or siloxanes, but no established recalls or complaints document leaching into skin or phone internals.

Possible

Polycarbonate UV degradation and microplastics

Extended outdoor UV exposure can cause PC to become brittle and microscopic fragments may shed; this is mechanical degradation rather than a chemical release risk and is typical for all PC cases.

None known

Flame retardant additives in polycarbonate

High-impact polycarbonate may contain flame retardant additives (phosphorus or halogenated compounds) to meet standards. No public data suggests these leach during phone case use, which involves no heating or food contact.

None known

Off-gassing from printing/labeling inks

Printed logos or labels on the case may contain organic solvents that off-gas, but exposure is minimal and dissipates quickly. No specific reports tie Pelican cases to solvent odor complaints.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Electronics Cases

Mous MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case

Mous

MagSafe Compatible Aramid Fibre Phone Case

Aramid fiber (Kevlar-type synthetic polymer)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; aramid is inherently PFAS-free but verify final coating.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Pelican Shield Carbon Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24

Pelican

Shield Carbon Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24

Polycarbonate shell, foam padding

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; typical phone case materials rarely contain PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Amazon Basics Clear Soft Tpu Smartphone Cover For Iphone 2021

Amazon Basics

Clear Soft Tpu Smartphone Cover For Iphone 2021

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. TPU phone cases rarely use PFAS, but Amazon discloses nothing.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof electronics cases grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.