40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
Patagonia Black Hole 25L Tote

Patagonia · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage

Patagonia Black Hole 25L Tote

F · High PFAS

Popular durable tote, but water-repellent coating origin unclear; lower concern than hardgoods.

Verdict: SkipRecycled nylon tote with established brand transparency; water-repellent coating origin unclear but low-migration risk in non-food storage use.

Black Hole tote uses recycled nylon with water-resistant treatment. Patagonia does not disclose PFAS status for this product; water-repellent coating chemistry unknown.

The safe swap

Coleman Chiller Cooler

Coleman

Coleman Chiller Cooler

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Recycled nylon with water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Black Hole 25L is constructed from recycled nylon with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the exterior. Recycled nylon itself is chemically inert once produced; the primary concern is the water-repellent coating finish, which may contain PFAS-based or fluorine-free formulations depending on manufacturing date and supplier. Unlike cookware or food-contact items, a tote's nylon-to-user contact is indirect and non-heated, minimizing leaching risk. The fabric is unlikely to shed microplastics during normal use because nylon totes do not experience the mechanical degradation (washing, high heat) that triggers polymer fragmentation.

The brand's record and disclosure

Patagonia has published detailed environmental and chemical disclosures for many product lines but has not publicly specified the water-repellent coating chemistry of the Black Hole tote series. The company has committed to phasing out legacy PFAS in apparel by 2025 and discloses use of PFC-free alternatives in some items, but blanket confirmation for this specific product is absent from public data. No recalls or safety incidents are on record for Black Hole totes. Patagonia's overall supply-chain auditing and transparency rank higher than most outdoor brands, though specificity on water-repellent coating origin remains a gap.

How it compares in its category

Non-insulated recycled nylon totes with water-repellent coating are the industry standard for durable, washable carry bags. Competitors (e.g., REI Co-op, Osprey, independent brands) use similar nylon-plus-water-repellent coating construction with comparable disclosure gaps. Patagonia's advantage is third-party certification (bluesign, Fair Trade Certified on some lines) and published take-back programs, which reduce lifecycle exposure compared to single-use or disposable alternatives. The main distinction versus untreated nylon is the water-repellent coating layer; fluorine-free variants are increasingly available but often cost more or compromise water resistance.

If you buy it

Wash the tote in cool water with mild detergent; avoid dry cleaning and excessive heat, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially release volatiles. Do not store food or potable water in direct contact with the interior for extended periods, though occasional beverage or snack transport poses negligible risk. Replace the tote if the exterior coating visibly peels, cracks, or flakes; degradation signals loss of water repellency and potential nylon shedding. Patagonia offers a Worn Wear repair service and accepts totes for recycling at end of life, reducing landfill exposure.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating leachates (non-PFAS)

If the water-repellent coating uses legacy PFC-based or undisclosed fluorine chemistry, incidental skin contact or sweat exposure could transfer trace compounds, though non-food-contact use minimizes absorption. Patagonia's 2025 commitment suggests newer production may use fluorine-free alternatives, but batch specificity is unknown.

None known

Nylon microplastic shedding

Recycled nylon totes do not degrade or shed microplastics during normal carry use because they experience minimal mechanical stress or heat. Risk would only arise if the tote were repeatedly washed in hot water or tumble dried, neither of which is typical for outdoor totes.

None known

Azo dyes or colorant heavy metals

No recalls or public data link Black Hole totes to azo dye toxicity or heavy-metal pigment contamination. Patagonia's bluesign and GOTS certifications on many garments suggest dye oversight, though this specific product's dye supply chain is not publicly detailed.

Possible

Formaldehyde or volatile off-gassing from dyes/finishes

New synthetic textiles can emit low levels of formaldehyde from dye carriers or finish resins during the first few washes. Airing the tote outdoors before first use and washing it in cool water minimizes exposure; risk is transient and low.

None known

Degradation and coating particle inhalation

If the water-repellent coating degrades from heavy use or age, small particles may be shed from the exterior, but inhalation risk is negligible in typical handling. Visible flaking or delamination warrants replacement to avoid contact with deteriorating material.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage

Coleman Chiller Cooler

Coleman

Chiller Cooler

Plastic (polypropylene) cooler body, foam insulation

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern cooler. No known PFAS-treated materials typical.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

YETI LoadOut 15 GoBox

Coleman

YETI LoadOut 15 GoBox

Rotomolded polyethylene plastic

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Hard plastic cooler with no known PFAS-linked coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Ezy Storage 5.28 Gallon Small Gasket Tote, Ip68 WaterProof Plastic Storage Bin with Lid, Gasket Seal and Durable Latches

Coleman

Ezy Storage 5.28 Gallon Small Gasket Tote, Ip68 WaterProof Plastic Storage Bin with Lid, Gasket Seal and Durable Latches

Polypropylene plastic with waterproof gasket seal, coating unspecified

F
F
PFASAll
F · High PFAS3 flags

Waterproof plastic storage; PFAS coating risk unclear, no disclosure.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.