40/ 100
F
OverallF10/100
Black Hole Cube 14L Patagonia

Patagonia · Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage

Black Hole Cube 14L Patagonia

F · High PFAS

Likely water-repellent coating-treated; Patagonia silent on PFAS composition specifics.

Verdict: SkipDurable nylon cube with likely Teflon-type coating-based water-repellent coating; Patagonia's silent stance on PFAS specifics and lack of full transparency warrant cautious use and care awareness.

Black Hole Cube is a nylon pack with water repellent finish, standard in outdoor gear. Patagonia does not disclose PFAS-free status or water-repellent coating chemistry; many outdoor brands have moved to PFOA-free formulations but transparency remains limited.

The safe swap

Coleman Chiller Cooler

Coleman

Coleman Chiller Cooler

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon fabric with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Black Hole Cube is constructed from nylon fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating. Patagonia does not publicly specify whether this water-repellent coating is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional fluorocarbon) or an alternative chemistry. Nylon itself is stable and non-leaching under normal use, but the water-repellent coating treatment is the material concern. The fabric has no glazes, enamels, or ceramic coatings, eliminating lead/cadmium and Teflon-type coating fume risks typical of cookware.

The brand's record and disclosure

Patagonia is known for environmental commitments and transparency in many areas, but has been notably silent on specific PFAS chemistry in its water-repellent coating treatments across product lines. The company has not published independent testing results or committed to PFAS-free alternatives on this model. This silence is a material gap given widespread industry adoption of Teflon-type coating-based water-repellent coating on performance textiles. No recalls or safety violations are on record for this product.

How it compares in its category

Compression cubes in this segment (14L soft-side packing organizers) almost universally use water-repellent coating-treated nylon; few brands disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Patagonia's refusal to specify whether it uses Teflon-type coating, polyfluorinated alternatives, or non-fluorinated water repellents makes direct comparison difficult. Competitors like Peak Design and some budget brands remain equally opaque. A meaningful safety advantage would require public commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating, which Patagonia has not declared for this product line.

If you buy it

Wash by hand in cool water with mild detergent; avoid hot water or machine washing, which can degrade the water-repellent coating coat and potentially liberate treatment particles. Do not dry-clean or use high heat. Reapply water-repellent coating treatment every 1-2 years if water beading diminishes; use a branded or third-party non-PFAS water-repellent coating spray if you wish to limit further fluorocarbon exposure. Store dry and avoid prolonged contact with food or drinking water. Replace if the fabric shows pilling, tears, or significant water absorption (signs of coating failure).

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

water-repellent coating treatment chemistry (Teflon-type coating or alternatives)

Patagonia does not disclose whether this cube's water-repellent coating is Teflon-type coating-based fluorocarbon or a non-fluorinated alternative. Industry standard for nylon performance textiles is Teflon-type coating, making Teflon-type coating-based water-repellent coating likely, but this is not confirmed by the brand.

Possible

Microplastics from synthetic fiber shedding

Nylon sheds microfibers during use and washing, particularly if the fabric is abraded or the water-repellent coating degrades. Risk is low for dry storage use but increases with packing heavy items or frequent compression. Washing exacerbates shedding.

Possible

water-repellent coating reapplication products (consumer-applied treatments)

If you reapply water-repellent coating yourself, commercial water-repellent coating sprays often contain Teflon-type coating or other fluorochemicals. Choice of reapplication product is a user-controlled variable; non-fluorinated alternatives are marketed but less common.

Possible

Degradation and coating failure over time

As the water-repellent coating coat wears, nylon can absorb moisture and may release treatment particles into contact with contents. No data on whether failed water-repellent coating on nylon poses direct chemical risk, but it signals material breakdown.

None known

Azo dyes (black dye risk)

Black nylon fabric typically uses azo or non-azo dyes; Patagonia does not specify dye class for this product. No safety recalls or contamination reports are on record. Risk is low for a storage cube with minimal skin contact.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear Storage

Coleman Chiller Cooler

Coleman

Chiller Cooler

Plastic (polypropylene) cooler body, foam insulation

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern cooler. No known PFAS-treated materials typical.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

YETI LoadOut 15 GoBox

Coleman

YETI LoadOut 15 GoBox

Rotomolded polyethylene plastic

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Hard plastic cooler with no known PFAS-linked coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Ezy Storage 5.28 Gallon Small Gasket Tote, Ip68 WaterProof Plastic Storage Bin with Lid, Gasket Seal and Durable Latches

Coleman

Ezy Storage 5.28 Gallon Small Gasket Tote, Ip68 WaterProof Plastic Storage Bin with Lid, Gasket Seal and Durable Latches

Polypropylene plastic with waterproof gasket seal, coating unspecified

F
F
PFASAll
F · High PFAS3 flags

Waterproof plastic storage; PFAS coating risk unclear, no disclosure.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear storage grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.