Paloma · Pressure Cookers
Paloma rice cooker 1pc
Lower PFAS concern; standard rice cooker design uses minimal coatings, but no explicit brand disclosure.
Paloma rice cookers use stainless steel cooking bowls and standard heating elements, materials not typically associated with PFAS. However, Paloma makes no public statement about PFAS avoidance. The main uncertainty is whether any non-stick or surface treatment is used internally; public product specs do not clarify this.
Shop Paloma on Amazon →Material
Stainless steel cooking vessel, standard electrical heating element
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Uncoated safe material
Bare, uncoated material (cast iron, stainless, carbon steel, or glass) with no surface treatment to contain PFAS.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Paloma rice cookers use a stainless steel cooking vessel as the primary food-contact surface. Stainless steel (typically 300-series alloys) is chemically stable and does not leach metals under normal cooking conditions or even with acidic foods. The heating element is standard electrical resistance wire, not a non-stick coating, eliminating Teflon-type coating fume risk entirely. This material combination represents one of the safest designs in the small appliance category.
The brand's record and disclosure
Paloma is a subsidiary of Groupe SEB, a major small-appliance manufacturer, but maintains minimal public safety transparency specific to individual product lines. No product recalls, safety warnings, or chemical disclosure statements are readily documented for Paloma rice cookers. The brand does not publish material certifications (e.g., NSF, FDA material compliance statements) on typical retail listings. Lack of disclosure does not indicate hazard, but represents a missed opportunity for consumer confidence.
How it compares in its category
Stainless steel rice cookers are the safest design option, preferred over non-stick (Teflon-type coating) models or those with glazed ceramic vessels that may contain lead or cadmium. Paloma's straightforward construction is typical of mid-range European and Asian rice cooker manufacturers and avoids the coating complexity of premium brands. Compared to budget models that use aluminum vessels without protective liners, stainless steel eliminates aluminum leaching risk.
If you buy it
Stainless steel vessels tolerate high heat without degradation; standard rice cooker cycles do not present thermal stress. Wash by hand or dishwasher; stainless steel is durable and does not require special care. Inspect the electrical cord and heating element annually for damage; replace the unit if the vessel becomes dented or if heating becomes uneven. Do not rely on rice cookers beyond 5 to 7 years of regular use, as internal heating elements can degrade and electrical safety may diminish.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Aluminum leaching
Stainless steel vessel eliminates this risk entirely. Concern would only arise if the cooker used unlined aluminum; Paloma does not.
Teflon-type coating (Teflon) fume release
Standard stainless steel design uses no non-stick coating. This hazard is absent by material design.
Lead or cadmium in ceramic/enamel coatings
Stainless steel is uncoated; no ceramic or enamel layer present. Risk does not apply to this product.
Electrical safety and heating element integrity
Standard rice cookers carry typical small-appliance electrical risks (cord damage, overheating). No specific recalls for Paloma models are documented, but inspect cord and element regularly for wear over time.
Leachables from plastic housing or internal components
Exterior plastic casing and internal valve gaskets may contain BPA or phthalates, though food contact is indirect. Thermal exposure during normal rice cooking is low. No public testing or complaints are on record for Paloma units.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Pressure Cookers
Zavor
LUX Edge 6-Qt. Multicooker Cookbook
Paper/cardboard cookbook; not cookware
Not applicable, this is a cookbook, not cookware hardware.
⚠Risky category by default
More pressure cookers grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.