65/ 100
D
OverallF49/100
Old Navy Women's High-Waisted Tapered Straight Chino Pants

Old Navy · Stain-Resistant Workwear

Old Navy Women's High-Waisted Tapered Straight Chino Pants

D · Elevated

Lower concern unless dyed or finished with water-resistant treatment.

Verdict: SkipCotton-blend chinos carry low established hazard burden; Old Navy has no major textile safety recalls; standard care mitigates residual dye and finish risks.

Standard chino pants in cotton blend with no disclosed water-resistant or stain-resistant finishes. Old Navy makes no PFAS claims; check garment tags for treatment details.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cotton-blend chino textile

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Old Navy chinos are typically a cotton-polyester blend (often 98% cotton/2% spandex or similar ratios), which is a stable, well-established textile construction. The cotton base means lower risk of synthetic polymer degradation compared to all-polyester alternatives. Polyester content introduces antimony (a catalyst used in polyester production) and potential azo dye residues, but at the low percentages used here, dermal exposure is minimal. Spandex adds stretch but is not a known accumulator of hazardous substances in apparel.

The brand's record and disclosure

Old Navy (owned by Gap Inc.) has not published detailed chemical disclosure or restricted substance lists specific to individual products. The parent company has signed the Sustainable Apparel Coalition's Higg initiative but does not granularly test or certify individual SKUs. No major textile safety recalls involving Old Navy chinos have been recorded in public databases. The brand's silence on PFAS and dye chemistry reflects industry norm for mid-market apparel rather than exceptional opacity.

How it compares in its category

Standard cotton-blend chinos from mass-market brands (Old Navy, H&M, Target, Gap) sit in the middle range for hazard disclosure and testing rigor. They are safer than unknown-origin fast-fashion imports but offer less transparency than certified brands (e.g., GOTS-certified organic cotton lines). The cotton-dominant blend is favorable; all-polyester or heavily finished chinos (water-repellent coatings) would carry higher PFAS and formaldehyde risk. This product's tier reflects typical retail chino safety, not premium or budget extremes.

If you buy it

Wash once in cool water before wearing to remove loose dyes and sizing agents that may irritate skin. Standard laundry detergent suffices; avoid high heat (warm/cold water preferred) to prevent polyester micro-shedding and reduce dye fixation stress on fibers. No special storage needed. Replace after visible wear (thinning, seam failure) rather than on a schedule; quality is typical for the price point, so expect 1-2 years of regular wear. If you notice unusual odor or skin irritation after first wash, rinse again and consider sensitivity to residual dyes rather than structural hazard.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Azo dyes and dye residues

Cotton-blend chinos are typically piece-dyed with acid or reactive dyes; azo dyes (carcinogenic metabolites if ingested) are not banned in US apparel but may be present in trace amounts. Risk is dermal contact and perspiration interaction; first wash removes majority of loose dye. Old Navy does not publish dye compliance data, so residual burden cannot be quantified.

Possible

Antimony in polyester

The spandex or polyester content (typically 2-5%) uses antimony as a catalyst; dermal leaching is minimal at this blend ratio. Hazard is primarily relevant during manufacturing and disposal rather than consumer wear. No specific Old Navy testing exists to confirm antimony residuals in finished garments.

Possible

Formaldehyde in sizing and finishes

New chinos may contain formaldehyde-based sizing agents used to set the weave during manufacturing. Concentrations in cotton apparel are typically low and washable. Old Navy products are not labeled as formaldehyde-free, but retail chinos under this price point rarely exceed CPSIA limits. First wash removes most residual sizing.

Possible

Spandex degradation and microfiber shedding

Spandex content (usually 2-5%) degrades with heat, light, and chlorine exposure, releasing microfibers into wash water. This is a usage issue rather than acute hazard, but contributes to microplastic accumulation in aquatic systems. Avoid hot water and bleach to extend spandex durability and reduce shedding.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments (if dyed dark colors)

Dark-colored chinos may use pigments containing cadmium or lead; however, no recalls or positive tests for Old Navy chinos exist in public records. Risk is theoretical unless a specific batch is recalled. Standard due diligence would require brand testing, which Old Navy does not publicly disclose.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More stain-resistant workwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.