65/ 100
D
OverallF59/100
Old Navy Women's Extra High-Waisted Taylor Wide-Leg Pants

Old Navy · Stain-Resistant Workwear

Old Navy Women's Extra High-Waisted Taylor Wide-Leg Pants

D · Elevated

Lower concern unless water-repellent coating treatment applied, check fabric tag.

Verdict: SkipCotton-polyester blend with no known chemical hazards; Old Navy has no major textile safety recalls. Standard care minimizes risk.

Standard cotton-polyester pants with no disclosed water-resistant or stain-resistant treatment. Most risk comes from unknown finishing; bare woven fabric is inherently lower PFAS concern.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cotton/polyester blend woven textile

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a cotton/polyester woven blend, a standard construction for everyday trousers. Cotton provides breathability and durability; polyester adds stretch recovery and wrinkle resistance. The blend ratio determines how much each fiber's properties dominate, but neither component presents inherent toxicity concerns at normal wear. Woven construction (as opposed to knit or bonded fabrics) typically involves fewer adhesives and chemical finishes, reducing off-gassing risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

Old Navy (Gap Inc.) does not publicly disclose PFAS or restricted chemical policies specific to garments, though parent company Gap Inc. has signed the Restricted Substances List (RSL) framework used across apparel. No major chemical safety recalls or regulatory actions are on record for Old Navy basic apparel. The brand operates at mass-market price point, meaning chemical screening is likely less rigorous than premium sustainable brands, but baseline safety standards under US and EU import rules still apply.

How it compares in its category

Cotton-polyester blends are the industry norm for everyday pants and carry no heightened risk vs. competitors at the same price tier. Old Navy's positioning is mid-market mass production; certified-organic or GOTS-audited alternatives exist but cost significantly more. For a standard work or casual pant without performance features (water resistance, stain treatment, etc.), this product avoids the chemical intensiveness of technical fabrics.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and dry on low heat or air dry to minimize polyester degradation and static. Inspect seams and hems after 10-15 washes for pilling or fraying; quality control at this price point is variable. No special precautions needed beyond standard garment care. Replace when elastic waistband loses recovery or seams separate, typically after 1-2 years of regular wear.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Azo dyes

Azo dyes (potentially linked to carcinogenic amines) are used in some apparel, but no specific azo-dye violations or recalls are documented for Old Navy basic cotton-polyester pants. Imports to the US are subject to CPSIA testing; if this product meets those standards, azo risk is minimized.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing resins

Formaldehyde resins are sometimes applied to wrinkle-resistant or easy-care finishes; a plain woven cotton-polyester blend typically does not receive these treatments. Check the fabric tag for terms like 'easy care' or 'permanent press', if present, low-level formaldehyde residue is possible but regulated under CPSIA.

None known

Antimony in polyester

Antimony is used as a catalyst in polyester fiber production and can leach if fabric is heavily degraded or improperly processed. No specific contamination reports exist for Old Navy apparel; modern polyester manufacture in regulated facilities (most blended polyester for US retail) keeps residual antimony well below concern thresholds.

Possible

Microfiber shedding from polyester component

Polyester-blend garments shed microplastics during washing, though this occurs with all synthetic textiles and is an environmental rather than wearer-health concern. Washing in cold water and air drying slightly reduces shedding; the risk to the wearer during wear or wearing is not established.

None known

Flame retardants

Flame retardants are not typically applied to basic woven pants unless labeled as sleepwear or meeting specific flammability standards. This product, as casual/work-wear, is not expected to carry added flame retardant chemicals.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More stain-resistant workwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.